Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Civil Liberties
Related: About this forumAmazon's Face Recognition Falsely Matched 28 Members of Congress With Mugshots
Jake Tapper Retweeted:The ACLU tested the facial-recognition software Amazon offers police. It falsely matched 28 members of Congress with mugshots of people arrested for a crime
Link to tweet
Amazons Face Recognition Falsely Matched 28 Members of Congress With Mugshots
By Jacob Snow, Technology & Civil Liberties Attorney, ACLU of Northern California
JULY 25, 2018 | 8:00 AM
TAGS Face Recognition Technology Surveillance Technologies Privacy & Technology
Amazons face surveillance technology is the target of growing opposition nationwide, and today, there are 28 more causes for concern. In a test the ACLU recently conducted of the facial recognition tool, called Rekognition, the software incorrectly matched 28 members of Congress, identifying them as other people who have been arrested for a crime.
The members of Congress who were falsely matched with the mugshot database we used in the test include Republicans and Democrats, men and women, and legislators of all ages, from all across the country.
Our test used AmazonRekognition to compare images of members of Congress with a database of mugshots. The results included 28 incorrect matches.
The false matches were disproportionately of people of color, including six members of the Congressional Black Caucus, among them civil rights legend Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.). These results demonstrate why Congress should join the ACLU in calling for a moratorium on law enforcement use of face surveillance.
To conduct our test, we used the exact same facial recognition system that Amazon offers to the public, which anyone could use to scan for matches between images of faces. And running the entire test cost us $12.33 less than a large pizza. ... Using Rekognition, we built a face database and search tool using 25,000 publicly available arrest photos. Then we searched that database against public photos of every current member of the House and Senate. We used the default match settings that Amazon sets for Rekognition.
....
By Jacob Snow, Technology & Civil Liberties Attorney, ACLU of Northern California
JULY 25, 2018 | 8:00 AM
TAGS Face Recognition Technology Surveillance Technologies Privacy & Technology
Amazons face surveillance technology is the target of growing opposition nationwide, and today, there are 28 more causes for concern. In a test the ACLU recently conducted of the facial recognition tool, called Rekognition, the software incorrectly matched 28 members of Congress, identifying them as other people who have been arrested for a crime.
The members of Congress who were falsely matched with the mugshot database we used in the test include Republicans and Democrats, men and women, and legislators of all ages, from all across the country.
Our test used AmazonRekognition to compare images of members of Congress with a database of mugshots. The results included 28 incorrect matches.
The false matches were disproportionately of people of color, including six members of the Congressional Black Caucus, among them civil rights legend Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.). These results demonstrate why Congress should join the ACLU in calling for a moratorium on law enforcement use of face surveillance.
To conduct our test, we used the exact same facial recognition system that Amazon offers to the public, which anyone could use to scan for matches between images of faces. And running the entire test cost us $12.33 less than a large pizza. ... Using Rekognition, we built a face database and search tool using 25,000 publicly available arrest photos. Then we searched that database against public photos of every current member of the House and Senate. We used the default match settings that Amazon sets for Rekognition.
....
Yeah, but:
So it worked
Link to tweet
Top right is Greg Gianforte. You will best remember him as the Montana Congressman who assaulted a reporter one day before he was elected.
Link to tweet
I was just about to say, doesn't he have an actual mugshot?
Link to tweet
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1469 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Amazon's Face Recognition Falsely Matched 28 Members of Congress With Mugshots (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
Jul 2018
OP
OregonBlue
(7,911 posts)1. This really does need to be stopped. This software frequently identifies the wrong person but
the police won't care. They will have a picture of the person they are looking for in their minds already and the facts won't matter. It also super targets people of color. As if there weren't enough people of color being falsely arrested or murdered by the police already.
reACTIONary
(5,993 posts)2. Are you SURE thst the matches were...
.... were false? Just askin'.