Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Walter Karp (Original Post) bemildred Dec 2011 OP
I loved Liberty Under Siege when I first read it deutsey Dec 2011 #1
That one was Ok. bemildred Dec 2011 #2

deutsey

(20,166 posts)
1. I loved Liberty Under Siege when I first read it
Tue Dec 13, 2011, 11:44 AM
Dec 2011

Very interesting book that traces American democracy from July 4, 1976 through 1988. Basically, he says in 1976 American elites were on the ropes after Watergate and the fall of Saigon and, consequently, a people-powered democracy had been re-awakened.

He points to Carter, an outsider to the Washington power establishment, who was nominated as a result of new, post-Watergate reforms that selected nominees more democratically than ever before. He said the power of this newly energized democracy such reforms fostered (in addition to a more activist-minded population) scared the elites (both on the Republican and Democrtaic sides), which, in turn, generated a Reaction among the political, economic, media elites to reassert their control. The Reaction (that's what he calls it) culminated in the destruction of Carter, the election of Reagan, and the rollback of democratic (small "d" ) gains made during the '60s and '70s.

Great book...the only big gripe I have about it is lacks substantial documentation. I'd love to see the sources upon which he based his book. I don't say he's making it up, I'd just like to look into source material to expand my own understanding.

I think I read an essay of his in Harper's as well. Beyond that, I haven't read anything else by him and know little about him as a person.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
2. That one was Ok.
Tue Dec 13, 2011, 12:02 PM
Dec 2011

I found his explanation of the politics of 70s and 80s very illuminating, it made little sense to me at the time.

I really liked "The Politics of War", which traces the period from McKinley to Wilson, and "Indispensible Enemies" which elaborates further on the Two Party system, where it came from and how it really works.

Then there is "Buried Alive", which is a collection of more recent essays.

But the reason I like him is that I find his explanations still are very useful to understand what is happening now. I have had a problem all of my life with figuring out what our politicians were up to, because they so consistently do what appear to be really stupid things.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»American History»Walter Karp