Pro-Choice
Related: About this forumMother, Son Charged with "Kidnapping" for Helping Idaho Minor Access Abortion
The 15-year-old who had an out-of-state abortion, identified in court records as K.B., was living in Idaho with her boyfriend and his mother when she became pregnant. In May, the same month Idahos abortion trafficking law went into effect, her boyfriend and his mother brought her to Oregon to obtain abortion medication.
K.B.s mother reported to the police that K.B. was taken out of state to obtain an abortion without her consent, sparking a police investigation. Police charged K.B.s boyfriend and his mother with multiple charges, including felony kidnapping. While the two were not specifically charged under the abortion trafficking law, reproductive justice activist and writer Jessica Valenti noted that prosecutors used the exact language of the trafficking law in the kidnapping charge.
The abortion trafficking law is currently being challenged in court, which may be why the prosecutors in this case decided to charge the two with felony kidnapping, instead of under the abortion trafficking law. Advocates believe that these charges are being used as a test case for the controversial statute.
Read More
NoRethugFriends
(2,961 posts)ShazzieB
(18,529 posts)What do you want to bet that mom is butthurt over her daughter moving in with boyfriend and his mom, and this is her way of getting back at the 3 of them? So childish.
If she had any sense, she'd be asking herself what was going on in her home that made her daughter want to leave. In my experience, teenagers don't move out of the family home just for fun and games.
But aside from all that, fuck Idaho and any other state that thinks it has the right to limit the ability of their residents to freely travel to other states and do whatever they want while there.
NoRethugFriends
(2,961 posts)ShazzieB
(18,529 posts)Last edited Sat Nov 4, 2023, 04:52 PM - Edit history (1)
I tried to word my comment so as to eliminate any possible ambiguity, in case anyone reading wasn't sure.
NoRethugFriends
(2,961 posts)Skittles
(158,503 posts)that is kidnapping regardless of intent
enki23
(7,794 posts)If it doesn't, then it's actually kidnapping, yes. But I don't think that's what it actually meant.
that is indeed poorly written
bucolic_frolic
(46,763 posts)Sounds hard to prove in this case.