Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dixiegrrrrl

(60,011 posts)
Fri May 17, 2019, 04:00 PM May 2019

Study Finds Ultra-Processed Foods Drive Weight Gain

The study, conducted by researchers at the National Institutes of Health, is the first randomized, controlled trial to show that eating a diet made up of ultra-processed foods actually drives people to overeat and gain weight compared with a diet made up of whole or minimally processed foods.


The study gave people a diet of processed food, and the control group got what I call "real" food...minimally processed food.

both groups had the same calories per meal. Both groups ate the meals for 2 weeks.

the ultra-processed food group gained weight, average of 2 pounds over 2 weeks, while the control group, eating real food, averaged a loss of 2 pounds over 2 weeks.

Here's the kicker...at the end of 2 weeks, the groups switched diets, and guess what? weight gain again with the processed foods.

the study also seemed to indicate the cause of weight gain on processed foods, which I found very interesting.

"........some of the hormones that are involved in food intake regulation were quite different between the two diets as compared to baseline,"
When the participants were eating the unprocessed diet, they had higher levels of an appetite-suppressing hormone called PYY, which is secreted by the gut, and lower levels of ghrelin, a hunger hormone, which might explain why they ate fewer calories. On the ultra-processed diet, these hormonal changes flipped, so participants had lower levels of the appetite-suppressing hormone and higher levels of the hunger hormone.


The entire article is important to read, has more detail and describes how the research was set up.
https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2019/05/16/723693839/its-not-just-salt-sugar-fat-study-finds-ultra-processed-foods-drive-weight-gain

I found a DU post by nitpicker, from late 2018, that talks about cancer links to utra-processed foods.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/114219211


8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Study Finds Ultra-Processed Foods Drive Weight Gain (Original Post) dixiegrrrrl May 2019 OP
K & R. Important info. to 'digest.' appalachiablue May 2019 #1
i see you're sticking primarily to the whole groan diet.... unblock May 2019 #2
In a sense, yep. But I realize the subject is serious stuff, life & death! appalachiablue May 2019 #3
I've been losing weight on a Mediteranean diet flygal May 2019 #4
I eat TONS of processed foods, but have never been overweight Skittles May 2019 #5
How exactly is "processed" defined anyway? Silent3 May 2019 #6
One of the definitions I've heard is dixiegrrrrl May 2019 #7
Scientifically speaking, that's a terrible definition. Silent3 May 2019 #8

appalachiablue

(42,820 posts)
3. In a sense, yep. But I realize the subject is serious stuff, life & death!
Fri May 17, 2019, 04:22 PM
May 2019

We've been trying to stay with nuitritious, simple and unprocessed food for several years.

flygal

(3,231 posts)
4. I've been losing weight on a Mediteranean diet
Fri May 17, 2019, 04:24 PM
May 2019

It makes me eat more whole foods. But I had been eating more canned tuna and eating more bread past week and it put on a few pounds.

Skittles

(158,430 posts)
5. I eat TONS of processed foods, but have never been overweight
Fri May 17, 2019, 04:29 PM
May 2019

but I do move a LOT - I average about 18000 steps a day

 

Silent3

(15,909 posts)
6. How exactly is "processed" defined anyway?
Sun May 19, 2019, 01:01 AM
May 2019

After all, grilling is a process, baking is a process, even chopping are stirring are processes.

I realize that when people say "processed foods" they're usually talking about things like Twinkies and cheese whiz and hot dogs, but shouldn't scientific studies be more specific?

Isn't it the particular "processes" that matter, and shouldn't different process be studied independently?

 

Silent3

(15,909 posts)
8. Scientifically speaking, that's a terrible definition.
Sun May 19, 2019, 11:57 PM
May 2019

You're not going to get to the bottom of real nutritional information with definitions like that.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Health»Study Finds Ultra-Process...