Health
Related: About this forumStudy Finds Ultra-Processed Foods Drive Weight Gain
The study gave people a diet of processed food, and the control group got what I call "real" food...minimally processed food.
both groups had the same calories per meal. Both groups ate the meals for 2 weeks.
the ultra-processed food group gained weight, average of 2 pounds over 2 weeks, while the control group, eating real food, averaged a loss of 2 pounds over 2 weeks.
Here's the kicker...at the end of 2 weeks, the groups switched diets, and guess what? weight gain again with the processed foods.
the study also seemed to indicate the cause of weight gain on processed foods, which I found very interesting.
When the participants were eating the unprocessed diet, they had higher levels of an appetite-suppressing hormone called PYY, which is secreted by the gut, and lower levels of ghrelin, a hunger hormone, which might explain why they ate fewer calories. On the ultra-processed diet, these hormonal changes flipped, so participants had lower levels of the appetite-suppressing hormone and higher levels of the hunger hormone.
The entire article is important to read, has more detail and describes how the research was set up.
https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2019/05/16/723693839/its-not-just-salt-sugar-fat-study-finds-ultra-processed-foods-drive-weight-gain
I found a DU post by nitpicker, from late 2018, that talks about cancer links to utra-processed foods.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/114219211
appalachiablue
(42,820 posts)unblock
(54,115 posts)appalachiablue
(42,820 posts)We've been trying to stay with nuitritious, simple and unprocessed food for several years.
flygal
(3,231 posts)It makes me eat more whole foods. But I had been eating more canned tuna and eating more bread past week and it put on a few pounds.
Skittles
(158,430 posts)but I do move a LOT - I average about 18000 steps a day
Silent3
(15,909 posts)After all, grilling is a process, baking is a process, even chopping are stirring are processes.
I realize that when people say "processed foods" they're usually talking about things like Twinkies and cheese whiz and hot dogs, but shouldn't scientific studies be more specific?
Isn't it the particular "processes" that matter, and shouldn't different process be studied independently?
dixiegrrrrl
(60,011 posts)If it comes in a box or jar and has more than 3 ingredients.
Silent3
(15,909 posts)You're not going to get to the bottom of real nutritional information with definitions like that.