Same-sex marriage advocates push for post-Roe protections

[Eugene]

Source: Associated Press

Same-sex marriage advocates push for post-Roe protections

By SAM METZ
June 7, 2022

SALT LAKE CITY (AP) — As the nation awaits a decision from the U.S. Supreme Court regarding a Mississippi law that calls for banning abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy, LGBTQ advocates are pushing to codify protections for same-sex marriage in states throughout the country.

Since the leak of a draft opinion alluded to the court potentially overturning abortion rights, concerns have grown over whether justices could next move to reverse other decisions that rely on the “right to privacy” that the court outlined in the Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion nationwide nearly 50 years ago.

The leaked opinion authored by Justice Samuel Alito, a member of the court’s 6-3 conservative majority, explicitly says the decision concerns abortion and no other rights.

But legal experts have speculated that similar logic could be used to reverse other decisions, including Obergefell v. Hodges, the 2015 case in which the court ruled same-sex marriage bans unconstitutional.

-snip-

Read more: https://apnews.com/article/abortion-us-supreme-court-samuel-alito-government-and-politics-marriage-d53d0b7512fce634fc13c52acc88eb6f

[AZSkiffyGeek]

1. Was Obergfell based on Privacy, or Equal Protection?

I don't want to downplay the seriousness, but if Obergfell was based on equal protection, the argument against Roe wouldn't apply, would it?
Not that Thomas and Scalito and their minions wouldn't gut equal protection as well...

[Eugene]

2. Both along with due process.

If right to privacy goes, everything is on the table including Lawrence (anti-sodomy), Griswold (contraception) and Loving (interracial marriage).

To the right, there is no privacy from their god.