Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(78,000 posts)
Tue May 22, 2012, 09:13 AM May 2012

A Step Forward for San Francisco BRT


A Step Forward for San Francisco BRT

San Francisco | 05/22/2012 7:42am |
Egon Terplan | SPUR





After more than six years of planning, and six months after the release of a draft environmental impact report, we now have a clearer picture of what bus rapid transit on Van Ness Avenue, a north-south San Francisco thoroughfare, might look like. This past Tuesday, the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) unanimously approved a combination of two out of the four designs under consideration.

Bus rapid transit (BRT) is similar to light rail in efficiency, but it uses buses instead of trains on tracks, which makes for lower costs and greater flexibility. Systems typically feature three ingredients:

• Dedicated lanes, usually in the center of the street

• Unique branding to make buses highly visible

• All-door boarding and proof-of-payment systems, often with payment required to be in the station area ...............(more)

The complete piece is at: http://americancity.org/daily/entry/a-step-forward-for-san-francisco-brt



3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A Step Forward for San Francisco BRT (Original Post) marmar May 2012 OP
About time! KamaAina May 2012 #1
Manhattan buses are a cruel joke.....It would be quicker to crawl. marmar May 2012 #2
I shudder to think of the new risks to pedestrians trying to cross to the center island for BRT. Gormy Cuss May 2012 #3
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
1. About time!
Tue May 22, 2012, 03:17 PM
May 2012

Van Ness, like most of central SF's north-south streets, has frequent intersections -- and red lights -- at the narrowly spaced east-west streets. Throw in stops every couple of blocks, and you have a transit nightmare unparalleled elsewhere except for Manhattan's notoriously pokey crosstown buses.

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
3. I shudder to think of the new risks to pedestrians trying to cross to the center island for BRT.
Fri May 25, 2012, 01:11 PM
May 2012

I'm sure the transportation engineers have it all worked out on paper but I do so hope that they keep in mind that Van Ness is already a daunting road for slower pedestrians and that BRT will increase the number of pedestrians crossing and will increase the number of jaywalkers trying to make it to the platform when the bus is coming.

I also wish that the Geary BRT plan was moving forward sooner. Geary should have had light rail installed at least 30 years ago.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Public Transportation and Smart Growth»A Step Forward for San Fr...