Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumEarth's water cycle Off balance for 'first time in human history'
Earth's water cycle Off balance for 'first time in human history'
Julia Conley, Common Dreams
October 19, 2024 7:27AM ET
https://www.rawstory.com/earth-s-water-cycle-off-balance-for-first-time-in-human-history/
"SNIP...............
Decades of mismanagement of water resources, deforestation, and the fossil fuel-driven crisis of global warming have put "unprecedented stress" on the Earth's water systems, according to a new report, and have thrown the world's hydrological cycle out of balance "for the first time in human history."
The Global Commission on the Economics of Water, affiliated with the Dutch government and comprised of global experts, published the study on Thursday, warning that policymakers must urgently "reframe the hydrological cycle as a global common good," recognizing that it is "deeply interlinked with the climate and biodiversity crises."
The hydrological cycle, or water cycle, is the continuous circulation of water between the planet's oceans, land, and atmosphere. The experts involved in the new report warn that rising temperatures and pollutiondriven by continued fossil fuel emissions and other industrial impactsare among the factors that are "undermining an equitable and sustainable future for all" in terms of water access.
The commission said a "new economics of water" is needed, recognizing that water connects countries and regions through atmospheric water flows as well as bodies of water.
............SNIP"
dweller
(24,886 posts)Other industrial impacts - let me guess
micro plastics , PFAs etc
✌🏻
applegrove
(122,922 posts)dweller
(24,886 posts)in ALL animals tested and all humans tested , even newborns
🫤
✌🏻
RandomNumbers
(18,120 posts)driven by - or at least vastly multiplied by - the inability of the human race to foresee and prevent over-population.
Oh wait, it was foreseen! Just that those who foresaw the general issue, got some details wrong and were written off.
Meanwhile we have a presidential candidate who wants MORE BABIES!!1! (at least if they're white); no matter if the woman might die in the process.
Meanwhile we see newspaper stories about a "demographic crisis" because of people not having enough(!) babies. Rather than about sensible ways to steer economies to successfully manage a declining population. (To be fair, I have seen an article or two on the latter topic. But I believe a survey would show the ratio at least 10:1 favoring the former theme. Sigh.)
Stargazer99
(2,926 posts)niyad
(119,489 posts)dchill
(40,328 posts)niyad
(119,489 posts)dchill
(40,328 posts)niyad
(119,489 posts)Clouds Passing
(2,061 posts)deal with the pervasive plastics and forever chemicals.
Remember the old tv commercial Better living through chemistry. Well it looks like we are worse off because of irresponsible chemistry.