Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumEditorial: Small nuclear plants may be key to state's energy mix (heraldnet)
The state allocated $25 million to fund review of a modular nuclear reactor as a climate solution.Tuesday, April 2, 2024 1:30am Opinion In Our View
By The Herald Editorial Board
Among the projects funded in the supplemental budgets signed Friday by Gov. Jay Inslee was a $25 million feasibility and review study that will consider the pros and cons of building a small modular nuclear reactor near the states only commercial nuclear energy facility, located north of Richland.
The $25 million is part of the supplemental capital budget, an allocation from the revenue generated from the Climate Commitment Acts cap-and-invest program, which since last year has been holding quarterly auctions of carbon credits, paid by the states heaviest carbon polluters. That money in last years and this years budgets is being used for a range of solutions for clean energy production, pollution and greenhouse gas reduction and correction of more than a century of harmful impacts from fossil fuels, in particular for disadvantaged communities, all meant to address the emissions impacts on a warming planet and peoples health.
Admittedly, nuclear energy is among the more controversial technologies with potential for joining the mix of cleaner sources of energy meaning less responsible for greenhouse gas emissions on which the state relies, including hydropower, solar, wind and energy storage projects.
The $25 million project faced a last-minute objection from an environmental group and a state tribal confederation that urged Inslee to veto the project. Columbia Riverkeeper, a longtime watchdog and critic of the lagging cleanup efforts at the federal Hanford Nuclear Site, also north of Richland; and the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation sought the governors veto.
***
more: https://www.heraldnet.com/opinion/editorial-small-nuclear-plants-may-be-key-to-states-energy-mix/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 588 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Editorial: Small nuclear plants may be key to state's energy mix (heraldnet) (Original Post)
eppur_se_muova
Apr 2024
OP
CoopersDad
(2,834 posts)1. Good. nt
NNadir
(34,596 posts)2. It is patently dishonest as "but her emails" media does...
...to call antinuke organizations "environmentalist groups." It is the equivalent of calling antivaxxers "medical organizations."
spike jones
(1,770 posts)3. I have read that France developed a design for a nuclear plant that worked well, and repeated it everywhere, but
I believe that all the plants in USA have been designed as one-off units. All are different, thus more expensive and less reliable.