Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumMeet the Shadowy Network Vilifying Climate Protestors
There have been some serious discussions here on DU about non-violent climate demonstrations and what the appropriate public reaction to them should be. I hope this article will give some insight as to how that public reaction is being manipulated and by whom. All emphasis below is mine. -Think. Again.
Original article by Amy Westervelt and Geoff Dembicki, Sep 12, 2023
Full Article: https://www.desmog.com/2023/09/12/atlas-network-vilifying-climate-protestors/
The Atlas Network is behind the effort to brand climate activists as extremists, and to pass anti-protest legislation.
Activists from Last Generation block a road in Berlin. Credit: Stefan Müller (CC BY 2.0)
It makes slightly more sense if we go back in time a couple of years and follow how one right-wing politician has been talking about The Last Generation. Frank Schäffler, of the Free Democratic Party, or FDP, is a member of the German parliament, or Bundestag, and is well known for hard-right positions. He came to some prominence several years ago as the leader of a small but loud contingent of German politicians who did not want Germany to bail out other EU countries like Greece during the 2011 debt crisis. More recently hes been the primary block to a national green building policy that would shift the country away from gas heating in new buildings, using a lot of the same tactics the fossil fuel industry has used to fight against gas bans in the United States: accusing the government of taking away citizens freedom of choice, spreading fear that the bill amounts to a heating ban, and general anti-regulatory rhetoric. Schäffler has described himself as a climate skeptic, and says things like Climate protection is only possible with [economic] growth.
Almost as soon as Last Generation began staging protests, in early 2022, Schläffler began describing them as extremists. When they threw mashed potatoes on a Monet in Potsdam, Schäffler took to Twitter to describe the act as terrorism. He made a similar statement just a few weeks later, comparing Last Generation to the Red Army Faction (RAF), also known as the Baader-Meinhoff Ganga leftist group categorized as terrorists by the West German government in the 1970s after they committed multiple kidnappings, bank robberies, bombings, and assassinations, killing more than 30 people. Last Generation, by contrast, are unarmed activists who have committed no acts of violence. Yet Schläffler has continued to call Last Generation terrorists in one way or another; Schläffler also began describing the group as a criminal organization, and publicly calling for it to be investigated for organized crime. Its a lot easier to justify ripping an activist off the road by their hair, or punching them in the face, when a prominent politician is comparing them to violent terrorists, and a major media outlet is repeating that frame, as both conservative publisher Welt and the more mainstream Der Spiegel have done with Schläffler.
Last Generation Activists at the Ministry of Transport advocate for one of their primary asks: the institution of a 100km speed limit on the Autobahn. Credit: Stefan Müller (CC BY 2.0)
Its hard to believe that a relatively young politician known primarily for a crusade against Greece that no one really took seriously has had such an outsized role in blocking climate policy and locking up climate activists. And of course, Schäffler is not acting alone. But something important happened between his debt and climate crusades that helps to explain his sudden influence: Schäffler started a think tank The Prometheus Institute and he plugged that think tank into a little-known but enormously powerful network called the Atlas Network.
-snip-
Much more in-depth information on the ATLAS NETWORK in the full article found here:
Full Article: https://www.desmog.com/2023/09/12/atlas-network-vilifying-climate-protestors/
The Unmitigated Gall
(4,487 posts)Money yet to save humanity.
Kid Berwyn
(17,818 posts)The owners of the worlds mineral rights want to get every last penny out of the ground down to the last drop. They destroy any and all who get in their way.
Brenda
(1,314 posts)multiple times for simply defending climate activists and setting the record straight. Lots of people here insist the activists have destroyed priceless Monet's and Van Gogh's.
Kind of strange that "liberals" get so worked up and spew hatred towards protestors doing things that they know will go viral and get media attention. I've seen them called terrorists.
Think. Again.
(17,324 posts)I couldn't understand why, on this discussion site of all places, people feel so strongly that smearing paint on glass, or delaying a game of tennis, is so much more evil than profiteering from deadly CO2.
I knew it had to be something the oil-friendly rightwing and media are doing to cause that irrational response, so I was not surprised to read this expose'.
Brenda
(1,314 posts)DBoon
(23,025 posts)Think. Again.
(17,324 posts)...I recently read about the techniques that are used by industry shills on social media and discussion sites.
A major part of it is to become a known poster for a while and gain trust, and to always post in a way that can allow plausible deniability of the thoughts you're trying to plant in people's heads.
If I can find that article again, I will post it here or make a separate thread.
DBoon
(23,025 posts)i promise to recc it
Think. Again.
(17,324 posts)TomWilm
(1,851 posts)... to have independent views on different kinds of actions and if their outcome can be considered productive for the ongoing struggle. I have done civil disobedience in several countries, but do not join actions where it is all too easy for the media to focus solely on the disruption and not on our goals.
In my opinion, the action should be chosen in such a way that it clearly reflects the goal and makes the purpose obvious to everyone. Blocking the main lobby organizations for agriculture and industry makes sense, and even more to interfere with the building of unnecessary highways or factories. Blocking sports and museums, not so much...
You do you. I disagree and will do something else.
Think. Again.
(17,324 posts)...but I suspect the goal of choosing specific venues for these demonstrations is to target the message directly to a specific group, such as the type of person who appreciates fine art on one occasion, and the type of person who appreciates sports events in another.
Perhaps the idea is to bring the message into the living rooms of people who would probably not even notice a demonstration taking place in the lobby of an oil company's headquarters.
TomWilm
(1,851 posts)... and a main point is also to get other groups to sympathize, who would normally not be in your corner. Many of the actions, I have joined, was more directed at such possible sympathizers.
We would attack the military system without attacking its officers. We had meetings with the leaders of the police to make sure, that they knew what we would do - since we were not fighting them, but the ways they themselves were being abused. We actually once coordinated the time for an action, so it would fit both their schedule and ours the best .
An aim can be to let the family of the politicians like our fun way of protesting, and bý this be influencing the politicians. Show them we are not enemies. I was once asked, what we would do when the police would be send in against us - my answer was: Offer them coffee. That made very positive coverage and photos.
Think. Again.
(17,324 posts)...that positivity is much more persuasive than negativity, the old carrot or stick thing.
But I'm not organizing these protests. I do appreciate that they are always non-violent, non-destructive demonstrations though, and I am sincere when express my gratitude to anyone who cares enough to go out of their way to keep pushing for a strong, quick transition away from fossil fuels, even if I think I could have done the demonstration better.
TomWilm
(1,851 posts)LiberaBlueDem
(1,147 posts)How stupid and made up is that BS?
Think. Again.
(17,324 posts)...that's a common, basic tactic they use to discourage support for anything alternative to fossil fuels.
They give these twisted, convoluted, and ultimately false explanations on how anyone supporting a non-CO2 emitting energy technology is actually trying to sell more fossil fuels. Somehow.
Pure gaslighting (pardon the pun).