Does Rising Inequality Make a Democracy More Warlike?

[unhappycamper]

http://smirkingchimp.com/thread/joshua-holland/59048/does-rising-inequality-make-a-democracy-more-warlike

Some folks inherit star spangled eyes
Ooh, they send you down to war, Lord
And when you ask ‘em, “How much should we give?”
Ooh, they only answer “More! More! More!”, y’all
It ain’t me, it ain’t me, I ain’t no military son, son
It ain’t me, it ain’t me, I ain’t no fortunate one, one
— Creedence Clearwater Revival, “Fortunate Son”

Does Rising Inequality Make a Democracy More Warlike?
Economic Equity | War
by Joshua Holland | October 17, 2014 - 10:08am

War has long been seen as an endeavor urged on by the elites who stood the most to gain from conflict – whether to protect overseas assets, create more favorable conditions for international trade or by selling materiel for the conflict – and paid for with the blood of the poor, the cannon fodder who serve their country but have little direct stake in the outcome.

That was certainly the perception of the Vietnam War when Creedence Clearwater Revival hit the charts with “Fortunate Son” in 1969. Millions of poor kids were drafted and sent overseas to fight and die in the jungle while children of the affluent got deferments to attend college. (Dick Cheney famously said of the five deferments he received during that time, “I had other priorities in the 60′s than military service.”)

Much has changed since then in terms of how and when wealthy democracies like the US make war. MIT political scientist Jonathan Caverley, author of Democratic Militarism: Voting, Wealth, and War, and himself a US Navy veteran, argues that increasingly high-tech militaries, with all-volunteer armies that sustain fewer casualties in smaller conflicts, combine with rising economic inequality to create perverse incentives that turn the conventional view of war on its head. His research looks at public opinion and military aggressiveness, and concludes that it’s the working class and poor who are more likely to favor military action today. And that bottom-up pressure makes wealthy democracies more aggressive.

BillMoyers.com spoke with Caverley about his research. The transcript below has been edited for length and clarity.

[Prophet 451]

1. Yes, it does

Several reasons:
1) The MIC needs war to get rid of loads of bullets and bombs so they can sell their whizz-bang replacements. And the MIC encompasses a lot, especially now that stuff like feeding and clothing the army has been outsourced.

2) Politicians like war because it gets rid of the surplus population of useless eaters (only the plebs die), benefits their MIC backers and let's them give rousing speeches and appear strong and purposeful by, say, landing on an aircraft carrier beneath a "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED" banner.

3) Media like war because it spikes their ratings and let's their reporters look all brave and dynamic.

4) And the middle-class likes war because it gets rid of the useless eaters and gives them sexy war footage to take their minds off their troubles.