Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(103,270 posts)
Sat Mar 9, 2024, 10:25 AM Mar 2024

Labor News & Commentary March 3, 2024 Subway employees strike over workplace violence & more


https://onlabor.org/march-3-2024/

By Otto Barenberg

Otto Barenberg is a student at Harvard Law School.

In today’s news and commentary, Washington moves closer to banning captive audience meetings and Subway employees strike over workplace violence.

On Thursday, Washington legislators passed a bill (SB 5778) banning captive audience meetings. Governor Jay Inslee (D) has voiced his support for the measure, which, if signed into law, would make Washington the sixth state with a captive audience ban after Oregon, Connecticut, Maine, Minnesota, and New York. At the federal level, although National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) General Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo contends captive audience meetings are inherently coercive and violate national labor law, the Board has not yet issued a ruling on the issue.

Worker advocates and unions celebrated the Washington bill’s passage, saying that a ban on mandatory anti-union meetings would deprive companies of a powerful weapon in their union-busting arsenals. Rick Hicks, Teamsters Western Region International Vice President and President of Teamsters Joint Council 28, commented: “Unions are fundamentally about economic democracy, which is why we need to make the process of organizing as democratic as possible by putting an end to this autocratic practice.” However, business groups have brought litigation challenging bans on captive audience meetings in Minnesota and Connecticut, arguing that they constitute “viewpoint-based discrimination” and are preempted by the National Labor Relations Act. Supporters counter that the bans leave employers free to express their views on unions and prohibit only a requirement that workers listen as a condition of their employment.

FULL story at link above.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Omaha Steve's Labor Group»Labor News & Commentary M...