Hillary Clinton
Related: About this forumI’m Not A Sexist, I Just Don’t Like Hillary Clinton for a Bunch of Sexist Reasons
By Megan Ford at medium.com (link):
I think its her voice.
Also her body language. I just dont trust it.
She happens to have a womans voice and a womans body, but me not liking those things are NOT related.
charlyvi
(6,537 posts)She's more qualified than most if not all male candidates pretty much ever (because she has to be) but that's not enough. But it;s not because she's a woman, oh no.
peggysue2
(11,472 posts)that screams sexism it's that one of the most qualified, experienced candidates in history is being compared to a narcissistic jackass with sociopathic personality disorder. Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are not equal candidates no matter how the media has spun the narrative.
The really laughable spin by the Trumptsers is that Hillary is controlling the message, deliberately baiting this fool because . . .
Well, I guess because she's a devious woman. That's how we roll, doncha know.
Hahahaha.
Like Ford's tongue in cheek.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Can pass all the test presented by this writer. If the candidates wasvjudhed by their voice (and faces) hands down between Trump and Hillary, Hillary will be the front runner. In fact I find her voice much morebpleasant than Sanders voice but I don't see a lot about either of her opponents getting judged on the same level.
spooky3
(36,100 posts)betsuni
(27,255 posts)DemonGoddess
(5,108 posts)among so many gems!
BlueMTexpat
(15,493 posts)One of my own faves:
One she omitted although it may be tacitly included more generally:
-- Hillary is such a bad candidate, ANY shiny new thing that isn't Trump (e.g., Gary Johnson, Jill Stein, etc.) is much worthier of my vote, whatever and whoever they may be.
ismnotwasm
(42,443 posts)Yup.
Demsrule86
(70,983 posts)she should not have run for president.
Response to Ellen Forradalom (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed