Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(66,432 posts)
Tue Sep 10, 2024, 06:07 PM Sep 10

Wisconsin Supreme Court justices question merits of case brought by election activist

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Liberal justices who control the Wisconsin Supreme Court voiced concerns Tuesday about the motives of a conservative activist who is seeking guardianship records in an effort to find ineligible voters while also appearing to cast doubt that the documents should be made public.

The lawsuit tests the line between protecting personal privacy rights and ensuring that ineligible people can’t vote. It is the latest attempt by those who questioned the outcome of the 2020 presidential race to cast doubt on the integrity of elections in the presidential swing state.

“What it sounds to me like what you are trying to do is to introduce the fear that there is some sort of illegitimacy going on in the election in the state of Wisconsin, and that concerns me deeply,” said liberal Justice Jill Karofsky during oral arguments Tuesday.

Former travel agent Ron Heuer and a group he leads, the Wisconsin Voters Alliance, allege that the number of ineligible voters doesn’t match the count on Wisconsin’s voter registration list. They want the state Supreme Court to rule that counties must release records filed when a judge determines that someone isn’t competent to vote so that those names can be compared to the voter registration list.



https://apnews.com/article/wisconsin-voting-ineligible-supreme-court-61eda6040ede6374504afaa0e846d3e8

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wisconsin Supreme Court justices question merits of case brought by election activist (Original Post) RandySF Sep 10 OP
Oh for fucks sake. pat_k Sep 10 #1
The Republican Conspiracies-R-Us party. Lonestarblue Sep 10 #2
Incompetent? slightlv Sep 10 #3
As part of a guardianship process WI courts. . . pat_k Sep 10 #4

pat_k

(10,310 posts)
1. Oh for fucks sake.
Tue Sep 10, 2024, 06:11 PM
Sep 10

Before invading privacy they'd better have irrefutable proof of cases where ballots have been cast by persons under guardianship who have been deemed incompetent.

slightlv

(3,722 posts)
3. Incompetent?
Tue Sep 10, 2024, 07:37 PM
Sep 10

I'd lay odds the testimonies would be different if it were guns... not votes... at issue! Republican hypocrisy knows no bounds!

pat_k

(10,310 posts)
4. As part of a guardianship process WI courts. . .
Tue Sep 10, 2024, 08:27 PM
Sep 10

also determine competency to vote. This pamphlet describes various ways one can lose right to vote, and can request it be restored.

https://disabilityvote.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Guardianship-and-voting-English-ACC.pdf

I have no idea what the hell these people are worried about. It all seems pretty straightforward.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Wisconsin»Wisconsin Supreme Court j...