Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(116,555 posts)
Thu May 10, 2018, 12:24 AM May 2018

Sanctuary cities measure debated in Nevada Supreme Court

Justices for the state high court fired a series of pointed questions at attorneys Tuesday in a case that could determine if Nevadans will be able to vote on an anti-sanctuary cities initiative.

At the heart of the case is the initiative’s language, which says it would prevent the Nevada Legislature and all local governments from passing any laws that would interfere with federal immigration laws.

Nevada ballot measures must contain only a single subject and clearly describe the effects the initiative would have if passed. The American Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit challenging that language, and Carson City District Judge James Russell ruled in January the “Prevent Sanctuary Cities” petition was “excessively broad and general,” and likely to confuse voters.

The Prevent Sanctuary Cities PAC, headed by Republican Senate leader and candidate for lieutenant governor Michael Roberson, appealed the decision to the state Supreme Court.

Read more: https://www.reviewjournal.com/news/politics-and-government/nevada/sanctuary-cities-measure-debated-in-nevada-supreme-court/

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Nevada»Sanctuary cities measure ...