Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(116,501 posts)
Sun Mar 7, 2021, 12:53 AM Mar 2021

Judge rules Harvard owns slave images, not descendants

March 6 (UPI) -- A Massachusetts judge ruled this week that a series of slave images belong to Harvard University, but the ancestor of the subjects who were forced to strip to the waist for the photos plans to appeal.

Middlesex County Superior Court Justice Camille Sarrouf said Tamara Lanier, who brought the lawsuit two years ago, did not own the images since her enslaved ancestors, father and daughter, Renty and Delia, whose photos were taken for a racist study, did not own them when they were taken.

"Fully acknowledging the continuing impact slavery has had in the United States, the law, as it currently stands, does not confer a property interest to the subject of a photograph regardless of how objectionable the photograph's origins may be," Sarrouf wrote in explanation of the judgment filed Tuesday.

Harvard professor Louis Agassiz commissioned the photos in 1850 for a study arguing that Black people were an inferior race. The photos are currently kept in a Harvard University campus museum. But Lanier, whom the court has not disputed is a direct descendant, said they're part of her personal family history.

Read more: https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2021/03/06/judge-rules-slave-images-Harvard-property-ancestor-appeal/1951615046391/

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge rules Harvard owns slave images, not descendants (Original Post) TexasTowelie Mar 2021 OP
Dumb judge. That's going to be reversed. The plaintiff... brush Mar 2021 #1
The ruling is correct MichMan Mar 2021 #2

brush

(57,241 posts)
1. Dumb judge. That's going to be reversed. The plaintiff...
Sun Mar 7, 2021, 01:56 AM
Mar 2021

should next sue for more than the photos. trump time is over with these repug judges.

MichMan

(13,025 posts)
2. The ruling is correct
Sun Mar 7, 2021, 09:46 AM
Mar 2021

Last edited Sun Mar 7, 2021, 10:18 AM - Edit history (1)

I am an amateur photographer.

I own the images I take, the subject does not. That has been clearly established in case law and taking a photograph applies copyright protection over it.

Can the Mona Lisa descendents therefore claim ownership over the painting?

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Massachusetts»Judge rules Harvard owns ...