Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Massachusetts
Related: About this forumBaker won’t back statewide sanctuary for illegals
http://www.bostonherald.com/news_opinion/local_coverage/2015/08/baker_won_t_back_statewide_sanctuary_for_illegals?utm_campaign=bostonherald_trending_stories&utm_source=bostonherald&utm_medium=trending_storiesBaker wont back statewide sanctuary for illegals
Thursday, August 6, 2015
Matt Stout
Gov. Charlie Baker today batted down a proposal to offer state-wide sanctuary protections to illegal immigrants, saying that option should be left to cities and towns.
We have a perfect example of why I dont think we should have statewide policy on this, Baker said at an unrelated State House press conference, pointing to a pledge by Lawrence Mayor Dan Rivera to not seek sanctuary status in his immigrant-heavy city and, conversely, moves by Mayor Joe Curtatone of Somerville, one of six Bay State sanctuary communities.
Im a former local official, so my view on this stuff is local officials for the most part, I believe, are most accountable to the people in their communities and they should make the decisions with respect to what they want to do and how they want to handle this, Baker said.
The Herald reported earlier this week that lawmakers were quietly pushing a bill to ban public agencies from giving or sharing information on illegal immigrants with federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement unless forced to do so by a court or a federal order.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1268 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Baker won’t back statewide sanctuary for illegals (Original Post)
unhappycamper
Aug 2015
OP
Whoever wrote that title should be informed that "illegal" is an adjective...
stone space
Aug 2015
#1
stone space
(6,498 posts)1. Whoever wrote that title should be informed that "illegal" is an adjective...
...and that in English, adding an "s" to an adjective doesn't make it a plural noun.
If somebody really likes using naked adjectives as standins for nouns and likes to pluralize said adjectives by adding an "s", they can get away with it a lot easier in Spanish than they can in English.
Doing it in English just makes the person appear illiterate.
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)2. Its also a noun
yes its an adjective, but its been used as a noun for a long time. Grammatically, the sentence is correct. You would argue that the use of the word illegal is disparaging, and against MLA reccomendations, but the use of illegal as a noun is ok.
merrily
(45,251 posts)3. Using it as a synonym for undocumented immigrants is dehumanizing, much as the disgusting Herald
intends.