Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Massachusetts
Related: About this forumReport: MBTA lost $450M in savings because of Pacheco Law
http://www.bostonherald.com/news_opinion/local_coverage/2015/07/report_mbta_lost_450m_in_savings_because_of_pacheco_lawHIGH COST: Gov. Charlie Baker backs a new report from the Pioneer Institute that says the Pacheco Law has cost the MBTA big bucks.
Report: MBTA lost $450M in savings because of Pacheco Law
Wednesday, July 8, 2015
Matt Stout
The controversial anti-privatization law known as the Pacheco Law which has swirled at the center of the MBTA reform debate has been a black hole thats cost the beleaguered transit agency nearly $500 million in savings since the late 1990s, according to a new report.
The findings, detailed in a Pioneer Institute report to be released today, provide what author and former state Inspector General Gregory W. Sullivan said is among the first looks of the Pacheco Laws impact on the MBTA.
This amount of lost savings would have gone a long way to reducing the MBTA costs and allowing it to replace older equipment. Instead the money just went into the black hole of the Pacheco Law, said Sullivan, who studied two contracts the T approved in 1997 to outsource bus services that were later rejected by the state auditors office under the anti-privatization statute.
The law, in existence since 1993, creates roadblocks to privatizing public services, and has been a hotly debated topic in discussions to reform the T. Lawmakers announced yesterday that they included a measure in their budget to suspend the laws provisions at the T for three years representing a compromise between the House, which sought five years, and the Senate, whose leaders had resisted it.
--
Outsourcing is never good for local jobs.
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Report: MBTA lost $450M in savings because of Pacheco Law (Original Post)
unhappycamper
Jul 2015
OP
peacebird
(14,195 posts)1. A Tea partylike, anti govt group did the study. Their partisanship makes their results suspect to me
pioneerinstitute.org/
A Boston-based public policy research institute advocating individual freedom and responsibility, limited and accountable government, and expanded ...
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)2. $450M in 'lost savings'.
Also known as $450M in salaries made by local Massachusetts workers that could have been siphoned off and paid out to shareholders around the world instead.
merrily
(45,251 posts)3. Baker is a protege of former patrician Governor Weld (R), isn't he?