Maine
Related: About this forumLePage staffer forced to answer same invasive questions he asked SNAP recipients
Putting a spotlight on the extensive and invasive information that low-income Mainers are required to disclose in order to obtain food stamps, U.S. Rep. Katie Porter of California fired question after question at a former Maine official credited with implementing that burdensome policy during a U.S. House committee hearing last week.
Sam Adolphsen, a right-wing activist and former chief operating officer at the Maine Department of Health and Human Services under former Governor Paul LePage, is credited with introducing strict work requirements that made it harder for Mainers to receive assistance from SNAP the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, more commonly known as food stamps. The Trump administration is trying to impose similar restrictions on the federal level and estimates that nearly 700,000 people across the nation will no longer be eligible for the program.
During a House sub-committee hearing on the proposed cuts, Porter posed a series of questions to Adolphsen, who now serves as policy director for the conservative Foundation for Government Accountability.
Mr. Adolphsen, how much do you pay each month for electricity and how often?
Read more: https://mainebeacon.com/lepage-staffer-forced-to-answer-same-invasive-questions-he-asked-snap-recipients/
Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)Hope he enjoyed the grilling.
kag
(4,106 posts)She is badass!
lastlib
(24,794 posts)She UNDERSTANDS their struggles, and she makes sure the witnesses get to feel their pain! I love that about her!
underpants
(186,384 posts)52 weeks x 40 hours = 2,080. That's the standard used in cost accounting and by HR departments.
That was excellent.
catbyte
(35,686 posts)That was awesome.
Cousin Dupree
(1,866 posts)jayschool2013
(2,459 posts)Sooner rather than later.
LittleGirl
(8,395 posts)thesquanderer
(12,323 posts)DinahMoeHum
(22,477 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)She's quiet, not hostile, a total wonk, sharp as a tack, and relentless.
They have nothing to mock her for, or to hold up as proving she's an "extremist."
She's not looking for celebrity, nor does she aspire to be on the cover of magazines - she buckled down on day one and does her job, doesn't get into twitter wars, or give a lot of interviews.
She gives them nothing to use against her, and has deadly accuracy in her questioning.
They don't see that coming from someone whose looks and demeanor are more like a midwestern mom running a bake sale than a legal sharpshooter.
jayschool2013
(2,459 posts)But I never underestimate the Republican smear machine.
"Katie Porter's California values" said with a sneer
"Katie Porter went to GOVERNMENT schools. Is it no wonder why she's filled with un-American leftist values?"
"Another Ivy League elitist trying to tell what you to do."
"Do you ever wonder why Katie Porter left Iowa for the coasts? Why she didn't fit in with Heartland America?"
You know, that kind of shit.
2naSalit
(92,335 posts)pain and agony for so many gets a moment of discomfort. I have no sympathy for him.
And Rep. Porter! I'm glad she's on our side!
hibbing
(10,400 posts)Joinfortmill
(16,336 posts)Katie Porter rocks it again.
33taw
(2,736 posts)lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)I think they should waterboard them.
TexasTowelie
(116,501 posts)PatSeg
(49,678 posts)OregonBlue
(7,894 posts)Go get 'em girl! Make them squirm.