Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(116,501 posts)
Wed Nov 11, 2015, 05:13 AM Nov 2015

Work requirement for food stamp recipients 'unreasonably harsh,' must go, group tells Jindal

A New Orleans organization advocating for low-income residents urged Gov. Bobby Jindal’s administration to end a new minimum work requirement enacted for more than 60,000 food stamp recipients.

The group Stand With Dignity sent a complaint letter to Jindal and his Department of Children and Families Services secretary, Suzy Sonnier, calling the work requirements “unreasonably harsh.”

The Jindal administration let a federal waiver expire on Oct. 1 that allowed adults aged 18 to 49 without children to receive food stamps without a work requirement. They will soon be required to work at least 20 hours per week or be enrolled in a federally-approved job training program to receive benefits.

States that meet certain U.S. Labor Department criteria have been able to get waivers from the work requirements in federal law.

Read more: http://theadvocate.com/news/13942253-123/jindal-administration-asked-to-reconsider

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Work requirement for food stamp recipients 'unreasonably harsh,' must go, group tells Jindal (Original Post) TexasTowelie Nov 2015 OP
Why does there need to be a waiver? MichMan Nov 2015 #1

MichMan

(13,025 posts)
1. Why does there need to be a waiver?
Wed Nov 11, 2015, 07:04 AM
Nov 2015

If the legislation requiring the 20 hrs wasn't already Federal law, states wouldn't be able to refuse to apply for a waiver in the first place. This legislation was signed into law in 1996 (nearly 20 yrs ago) under the Welfare Reform Act. This should not even be an issue as it shouldn't have been signed in the first place and there have been plenty of opportunities to repeal it

What do our current candidates have to say about it?
Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Louisiana»Work requirement for food...