Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

47of74

(18,470 posts)
Thu Jun 14, 2018, 07:51 AM Jun 2018

Kimmy wants to write discrimination into the Iowa Constitution

Ugh

Iowa’s governor appeared to signal support for an amendment to the state’s constitution that would ban same-sex marriage this week.

During a news conference in Pella on Tuesday, Governor Kim Reynolds was asked about a proposed plank in the state Republican party’s platform calling for a repeal of any laws that allow marriage between same-sex couples.

The Iowa Supreme Court ruled same-sex marriage legal in the state back in 2009, but Reynolds says she’d prefer the issue be put to a vote.


I absolutely hate her and the rest of the Iowa GOP.
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Kimmy wants to write discrimination into the Iowa Constitution (Original Post) 47of74 Jun 2018 OP
Under Obergefell same sex marriage is rsdsharp Jun 2018 #1
Of course the supremacy clause prevails, but that is secondary. slumcamper Jun 2018 #2
Yeah they're hoping to get some more reich wing judges in who will take the US back to the 50s. 47of74 Jun 2018 #3

rsdsharp

(10,098 posts)
1. Under Obergefell same sex marriage is
Thu Jun 14, 2018, 10:31 AM
Jun 2018

a right under the US Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land. The Iowa Constitution can't trump that.

slumcamper

(1,722 posts)
2. Of course the supremacy clause prevails, but that is secondary.
Thu Jun 14, 2018, 12:45 PM
Jun 2018

There are many insidious motives attendant with such posturing and "flouting" of law. To name a few:

1) Throw red meat to the evangelical and social conservative base and solidify GOP standing with them.
2) Activate and motivate RW voters to turnout (as if sharks in the water feeding on red meat).
3) Force AG Miller to refuse to defend such an amendment, if passed, when it is challenged in court--which it most certainly would be.
4) Create a public "forum" in which to incite harassment and persecution, both verbal and otherwise, of our LGTBQ friends in Iowa.

And we would be well advised to remember that so-called "supreme" law is inherently and perpetually unsettled, and that any SCOTUS ruling is tenuous, at best, and can be overturned on principle. This is especially the case with recent, less-institutionalized precedent. The equal protection principle is ever-evolving (or DEVOLVING under conservative rulings).


 

47of74

(18,470 posts)
3. Yeah they're hoping to get some more reich wing judges in who will take the US back to the 50s.
Thu Jun 14, 2018, 07:25 PM
Jun 2018

The 1850s, that is.

If Kimmie and the rest of them get that particular wet dream then that constitutional amendment would come in to force.

Kimmie needs to be opposed at every turn from now until November. I hope Hubble plans on being a hard, pipe hitting sort of opponent here.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Iowa»Kimmy wants to write disc...