Connecticut’s delegation in D.C. calls for debate, vote on using military force against Islamic Stat

[NutmegYankee]

Connecticut’s delegation in D.C. calls for debate, vote on using military force against Islamic State group

Members of Connecticut's delegation in Washington, D.C., are calling for their colleagues to debate and vote on the prospect of using military force against the Islamic State group following recent news reports that Congress is avoiding what would be the first war vote in 13 years.

"Congress should perform its duty and its responsibility," U.S. Rep. John Larson, D-1st District, said by phone Tuesday in advocating for a vote on the issue. Larson said there's "no question" certain members of Congress are "skirting the issue."

Larson said the scope and limitations of military force will determine whether or not he would vote yes. He said he has strong reservations to putting boots on the ground.

"Training, assisting, providing air cover is different than boots on the ground," he said.
http://www.theday.com/military/20151110/connecticuts-delegation-in-dc-calls-for-debate-vote-on-using-military-force-against-islamic-state-group

[Agnosticsherbet]

1. Republicans leadership in the House and Senate

Should requires those discussions and a vote.

I suspect they will continue to avoid their Constitutional requirements.

Obama tried to end the previous authorization for the use of force before and asked for a new AUMF when thus started. Congress refused.