Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hlthe2b

(106,075 posts)
Mon Nov 5, 2012, 12:58 PM Nov 2012

Damn, there has to be a better way to determine who to retain as justices on CO ballet

That judicial group that supposedly makes recommendations almost never votes to NOT retain anyone.

So, I google the names looking for controversy. Gotta be a better way.....

Thoughts?


I just retained them all, feeling very uninformed and probably a pawn. But, off to hand deliver my mail in ballot.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Damn, there has to be a better way to determine who to retain as justices on CO ballet (Original Post) hlthe2b Nov 2012 OP
That's true everywhere. SheilaT Nov 2012 #1
Try to determine who appointed them R or D. Democrats_win Nov 2012 #2
Read the election ballot information booklet. h2ebits Nov 2012 #3
I didn't receive one... Downloaded voter guide info available online & that wasn't included hlthe2b Nov 2012 #4
YOUR LAST POST luckyleftyme2 Feb 2013 #6
Does anyone have a clue what this poster is trying to say????? hlthe2b Feb 2013 #7
I was a juror for one of the justices that was up for election Panasonic Nov 2012 #5
 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
1. That's true everywhere.
Mon Nov 5, 2012, 01:01 PM
Nov 2012

A judge has to be incredibly awful for the judicial group or even the local newspaper to suggest that they not be retained.

I suppose you could do a bunch of research on each of the judges to decide if they warrant your vote to retain. It's distantly possible that a non-partisan group like the League of Women Voters can give you an assessment of the judges.

Often, because I haven't a clue about the judges myself, I simply don't mark that part of the ballot.

Democrats_win

(6,539 posts)
2. Try to determine who appointed them R or D.
Mon Nov 5, 2012, 01:10 PM
Nov 2012

The blue book that is mailed to the voters usually tells when they were appointed. So you match up the years of the governor's term with the year they were appointed. All you really need to know is that the Republican was governor form January 12, 1999 till January 12, 2007. So if they fall in those years, they should be thrown out.

Wikipedia has a table for the Colorado governor's terms

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colorado_Governor

h2ebits

(762 posts)
3. Read the election ballot information booklet.
Mon Nov 5, 2012, 04:56 PM
Nov 2012

I rejected a handful of the judges in Colorado just based on reading the ballot information booklet that was mailed to my house. Yes, the group did vote to retain 100% but the comment section does say enough to give you a moment to think about whether you agree with the judicial group or not.

I have a friend who voted no on many of the judges--including the sitting state supreme court judge.

hlthe2b

(106,075 posts)
4. I didn't receive one... Downloaded voter guide info available online & that wasn't included
Mon Nov 5, 2012, 07:15 PM
Nov 2012

I've been out of state the past six weeks dealing with post surgical recovery of a close family member. My mail was held and I got my ballot but no blue book. 'Had to turn in the ballot today because I will be totally unavailable tomorrow.

So, since you received one, which justices did you believe should NOT be retained?

hlthe2b

(106,075 posts)
7. Does anyone have a clue what this poster is trying to say?????
Mon Feb 18, 2013, 07:56 PM
Feb 2013

I can only guess the the bars had a "12 for one" in his area because this post (in reply to an election-related thread from November) makes no sense whatsoever (but apparently I am to be "watched"... )

 

Panasonic

(2,921 posts)
5. I was a juror for one of the justices that was up for election
Thu Nov 22, 2012, 08:11 PM
Nov 2012

She did a good job on that case, and I retained her, of course.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Colorado»Damn, there has to be a b...