Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(70,348 posts)
Wed Sep 18, 2024, 06:32 PM Sep 18

Campaigns battle over the fate of 2 AZ Supreme Court justices who ushered in the 1864 abortion ban

Judicial retention elections usually aren’t the sexiest items on the ballot, but this year two campaigns are fighting to persuade voters to either retain or throw out two Arizona Supreme Court justices.

At the same time, voters will be considering a constitutional amendment that would essentially give judges lifetime appointments.

Justices Clink Bolick and Kathryn King are up this year for a routine retention vote that the judges on the high court face every six years. And if voters in November favor Proposition 137, dubbed “The Judicial Accountability Act of 2024,” it could be their last retention election ever.

Voters have never kicked an Arizona Supreme Court justice off the bench in the 50 years since the state implemented judicial retention elections, but historically those elections didn’t get much attention and were questions that some voters just skipped.





https://azmirror.com/2024/09/18/campaigns-battle-over-the-fate-of-2-az-supreme-court-justices-who-ushered-in-the-1864-abortion-ban/

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»Arizona»Campaigns battle over the...