Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(62,626 posts)
Mon Jan 7, 2019, 10:36 AM Jan 2019

U.S. top court snubs actress de Havilland's suit against FX Networks

Source: Reuters

ENTERTAINMENT NEWS JANUARY 7, 2019 / 10:16 AM / UPDATED 16 MINUTES AGO

U.S. top court snubs actress de Havilland's suit against FX Networks

Jan Wolfe
3 MIN READ

(Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to consider reviving a lawsuit by 102-year-old Oscar-winning actress Olivia de Havilland accusing a Twenty-First Century Fox Inc unit of falsely portraying her in a miniseries about a famous Hollywood feud.

The justices let stand a lower court ruling throwing out the lawsuit filed by de Havilland, a Hollywood star whose career began in the 1930s. She had claimed that “Feud: Bette and Joan,” a FX Networks miniseries about a famous feud between de Havilland’s fellow screen legends Bette Davis and Joan Crawford damaged her reputation by portraying her as a gossip and hypocrite.

“Feud,” which aired in 2017, explored the bad blood between Crawford and Davis in the later years of their lives. The miniseries was created by producer Ryan Murphy, known for the series “American Horror Story” and “Glee.”

In February 2018, Murphy agreed to create exclusive series and films for Netflix Inc as part of a five-year deal expected to be worth up to $300 million.

De Havilland was portrayed by Catherine Zeta-Jones in “Feud,” which starred Jessica Lange as Joan Crawford and Susan Sarandon as Bette Davis. De Havilland objected to scenes in which she was portrayed as using a vulgar term to refer to her sister, actress Joan Fontaine, and joking about Frank Sinatra’s drinking.

-snip-


Read more: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-dehavilland/u-s-top-court-snubs-actress-de-havillands-suit-against-fx-networks-idUSKCN1P11HD
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. top court snubs actress de Havilland's suit against FX Networks (Original Post) Eugene Jan 2019 OP
I remember the controversy exboyfil Jan 2019 #1
I agree hotrod0808 Jan 2019 #2
Whatever the merits of her case or lack thereof, my advice to her would've been: sandensea Jan 2019 #3

exboyfil

(17,975 posts)
1. I remember the controversy
Mon Jan 7, 2019, 11:05 AM
Jan 2019

Around the portrayal of Max Baer the boxer in Cinderella Man. It was over the top and hurtful to his son the actor. It is a shame that biopics do this.

hotrod0808

(323 posts)
2. I agree
Mon Jan 7, 2019, 11:53 AM
Jan 2019

In the lives of some of these celebrities, there is often no need to create drama, because the stories as they are tend to fascinate. Some are too fascinating and border on the unbelievable. If memory serves, the biopic for Sergent York had to be toned down because the actual stories of him in battle seemed too spectacular for a Hollywood film. Hell, even seeing Bohemian Rhapsody with my wife was tough, because I am thinking "that didn't happen that way."

Oh, and as an aside, I almost walked out of Unstoppable because I lived the actual event that runaway train was based upon, and the film was utter dogshit.

sandensea

(22,850 posts)
3. Whatever the merits of her case or lack thereof, my advice to her would've been:
Mon Jan 7, 2019, 04:45 PM
Jan 2019

Olivia, old gal, you should've started up a vulture fund.

Their judges are usually quite literally theirs, and they usually get certoriari - or get it denied to the people they're fleecing.

With most of the business press waving pom-poms for them, I might add.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»TV Chat»U.S. top court snubs actr...