Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

left-of-center2012

(34,195 posts)
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 09:05 AM Mar 2019

Edvard Munch's 'The Scream'

Edvard Munch's The Scream may be one of the most recognizable images in art history, but the British Museum thinks most people have got it all wrong. The figure isn't screaming—he's hearing a scream, the curator of a new exhibit tells the Telegraph. This debate has actually been going on for years, but the museum says Munch's own words make things clear.

As Quartz explains, the museum is featuring a rare black-and-white lithograph that predates the more famous later painting. Below the lithograph, Munch wrote: "I felt the great scream throughout nature." He was referring to the anxiety he felt one day while walking in nature when the sky turned red. Basically, the figure is hearing, or sensing, a scream from nature, according to this interpretation.

The inscription "makes clear that Munch's most famous artwork depicts a person hearing a 'scream' and not, as many people continue to assume and debate, a person screaming," says Giulia Bartrum of the museum. "He was trying to capture an emotion or moment in time. Through the inscription we know how he felt. People think this is a screaming person, but that's not what is going on."

http://www.newser.com/story/272931/the-scream-figure-may-not-actually-be-screaming.html

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Ohiogal

(34,506 posts)
1. Such a great work
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 09:17 AM
Mar 2019

and yes he is supposed to be hearing a scream.

I think, though, as with most any artwork, it’s totally up to the viewer to decide what he/she sees in the piece.

happybird

(5,090 posts)
9. Read an interesting article a few months ago
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 11:03 AM
Mar 2019

on how this and two other paintings were reactions to technological advancements. That head certainly does resemble a giant light bulb.

https://www.wired.com/story/how-science-and-tech-left-an-imprint-on-3-iconic-paintings/amp

 

Perseus

(4,341 posts)
10. Some pieces do have to be explained
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 11:07 AM
Mar 2019

I am an artist, as a hobby, and my work is usually realist, I do portraits, but once in a while I will venture in the, not abstract, but more contemporary, which I enjoy a lot because I like to put special meaning on each one, and I paint them much faster than the detailed portrait, which has to be as close as possible as the sitter, people must be able to tell who the person is.

Anyway, I have a couple that I painted in four small canvas (8" x 10" ) each, one is very telling because it is called "One night stand" (they meet, the go out together, they have sex, then she leaves), I don't have to explain that one, but the other one reflects what I see is "Society's Cycle", and only one person has been able to describe most of what is happening. I put it in a show and I had to write down the description because, and this is from my personal view, I do want people to understand exactly what and why I painted each one.

When I didn't have the description it just flew over most people's head, and they just walked by it like "OK, interesting", but after I put the description they stayed, some laughed, most had comments, which was great.

Ohiogal

(34,506 posts)
3. I thought of that myself ...
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 09:26 AM
Mar 2019

The earth is screaming over all the abuse she’s taken at the hands of us humans.

crazytown

(7,277 posts)
11. The full scream quote
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 11:14 AM
Mar 2019
the sun set; suddenly, the sky turned as red as blood. I stopped and leaned against the fence, feeling unspeakably tired. Tongues of fire and blood stretched over the bluish black fjord. My friends went on walking, while I lagged behind, shivering with fear. Then I heard the enormous, infinite scream of nature

PatrickforO

(15,100 posts)
13. Yes, the earth screams at the destruction caused by capitalism.
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 11:25 AM
Mar 2019

This has always been one of my favorite paintings. Yes, hearing a scream, but screaming too, in sympathy with our earth at the damage our species has done to all life.

I sometimes say, "Once you know, you can't ever go back," and it is true. Once you wake up to the horrors we are inflicting on this planet, all the life that is on it, and see our cruelty and greed, it is hard not to scream right along with the great earth soul.

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
15. I always thought it was a scream related to the figure's surroundings
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 11:43 AM
Mar 2019

Like Van Gough in his paintings giving nature a visceral, wild presence with the skies and landscapes alive with vortices and motion. I also think he saw nature as living, feeling scapes of raw emotion. The Scream is like that, though I’ve mistakenly thought it was the figure screaming.

I’m glad to know the truth. It adds so much more to the painting!

samnsara

(18,281 posts)
14. im voting for the man leaning against the fence as the author of the quote...
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 11:26 AM
Mar 2019

..because maybe the person in the foreground is nature screaming. ..JMHP cuz its 9 30 am and im on my 2nd mimosa.

William Seger

(11,021 posts)
16. I've never liked that painting
Sat Mar 23, 2019, 12:20 PM
Mar 2019

Whatever else you can say about it, including calling it great art, I think it's ugly.

There! I've said it! After all these years, I feel like a free man!

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Artists»Edvard Munch's 'The Screa...