Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Dulcinea

(7,408 posts)
Mon Jul 1, 2024, 08:36 PM Jul 2024

Trump seeks to set aside New York hush money verdict hours after Supreme Court ruling

NEW YORK (AP) — Donald Trump’s lawyers on Monday asked the New York judge who presided over his hush money trial to set aside his conviction and delay his sentencing, scheduled for next week.

The letter to Judge Juan M. Merchan cited the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling earlier Monday and asked the judge to delay Trump’s sentencing while he weighs the high court’s decision and how it could influence the New York case, according to the letter obtained by The Associated Press.

The lawyers argue that the Supreme Court’s decision confirmed a position the defense raised earlier in the case that prosecutors should have been precluded from introducing some evidence they said constituted official presidential acts, according to the letter.

In prior court filings, Trump contended he is immune from prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office. His lawyers did not raise that as a defense in the hush money case, but they argued that some evidence — including Trump’s social media posts about former lawyer Michael Cohen — comes from his time as president and should have been excluded from the trial because of immunity protections.

https://apnews.com/article/trump-hush-money-supreme-court-immunity-3d97d2e9497a5a208c1309aec7a0cd6a

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump seeks to set aside New York hush money verdict hours after Supreme Court ruling (Original Post) Dulcinea Jul 2024 OP
Might as well go direct to the USSc for a 6-3 decision in his favor. OAITW r.2.0 Jul 2024 #1
It was ready to go because he was assured it was coming. onecaliberal Jul 2024 #2
I thought the ruling for immunity was for while he was on official presidential duties Deuxcents Jul 2024 #3

OAITW r.2.0

(28,243 posts)
1. Might as well go direct to the USSc for a 6-3 decision in his favor.
Mon Jul 1, 2024, 08:53 PM
Jul 2024

Will help clarify this Court's total disregard for the rule of law. Single Party State, here we come!

Deuxcents

(19,556 posts)
3. I thought the ruling for immunity was for while he was on official presidential duties
Mon Jul 1, 2024, 09:00 PM
Jul 2024

He was not on official business with Stormy Daniels. But, hey! Why not just give it to him, SC?

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Trump seeks to set aside ...