Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Partner Finds Having Sex With A Junior Attorney On His Desk Isn't A Terrific Career Move
I suppose "life imitating Costanza" counts as "life imitating art".
https://abovethelaw.com/2024/06/partner-finds-having-sex-with-a-junior-attorney-on-his-desk-isnt-a-terrific-career-move/
Partner Finds Having Sex With A Junior Attorney On His Desk Isn't A Terrific Career Move
His behavior was 'wrong and inappropriate.'
By KATHRYN RUBINO
on June 25, 2024 at 4:17 PM
Jasvinder Gill was a senior partner at Hatten Wyatt in Kent, England. But he’s now suspended from the legal profession for two years — and ordered to pay £85,501 in costs — after a disciplinary tribunal found he “used his position of influence and authority in the workplace to create situations in which office relationships, sexual in intent, were initiated and pursued by him.”
That’s not a great look.
As reported by RollOnFriday, the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal found Gill repeatedly created an “unsettling dilemma” for junior staff members “that rebuffing him would or could count against them in their continuing employment.”
The Tribunal heard evidence that Gill kissed one staffer in his office, on other occasions he stroked her hair or gave her shoulder massages. He also told this person that “proper office attire” was “open-toed shoes, stockings and not tights, and short skirts.”
[...]
His behavior was 'wrong and inappropriate.'
By KATHRYN RUBINO
on June 25, 2024 at 4:17 PM
Jasvinder Gill was a senior partner at Hatten Wyatt in Kent, England. But he’s now suspended from the legal profession for two years — and ordered to pay £85,501 in costs — after a disciplinary tribunal found he “used his position of influence and authority in the workplace to create situations in which office relationships, sexual in intent, were initiated and pursued by him.”
That’s not a great look.
As reported by RollOnFriday, the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal found Gill repeatedly created an “unsettling dilemma” for junior staff members “that rebuffing him would or could count against them in their continuing employment.”
The Tribunal heard evidence that Gill kissed one staffer in his office, on other occasions he stroked her hair or gave her shoulder massages. He also told this person that “proper office attire” was “open-toed shoes, stockings and not tights, and short skirts.”
[...]
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
= new reply since forum marked as read
?width=1200
... I'm sure creep-o Lauer has an entire of list of women who never said a word outside the office. There is a REASON why this guy is unemployed and twice-divorced.
