Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(62,485 posts)
Fri Jun 21, 2024, 02:59 AM Jun 21

Supreme Court rules against convicted drug mule who claimed no knowledge of drugs in car

Source: NBC News

Supreme Court rules against convicted drug mule who claimed no knowledge of drugs in car

Delilah Guadalupe Diaz argued that testimony suggesting she most likely knew of the presence of drugs in her vehicle when she was stopped unlawfully undermined her defense.

June 20, 2024, 10:24 AM EDT / Updated June 20, 2024, 11:47 AM EDT
By Lawrence Hurley

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled against a convicted drug mule from California who objected to evidence admitted at her trial that suggested she would have been aware of thousands of dollars’ worth of methamphetamine found in her car.

The 6-3 ruling means Delilah Guadalupe Diaz's conviction is upheld.

Diaz has maintained that she was a "blind" mule, a term for someone who transports drugs unwittingly.

Diaz, a U.S. citizen living in California, was stopped by a Border Patrol agent in August 2020 after having crossed into the U.S. from Mexico at the San Ysidro port of entry.

-snip-

Read more: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-drug-mule-methamphetamine-ruling-rcna150271

________________________________________________

Related:
23-14 Diaz v. United States (U.S. Supreme Court)
Gorsuch chastises Supreme Court majority in drug trafficking case dissent (The Hill)

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court rules against convicted drug mule who claimed no knowledge of drugs in car (Original Post) Eugene Jun 21 OP
It is a relief Gorsuch saw it this way. Passages Jun 21 #1
Interesting that Jackson voted with the majority. onenote Jun 21 #2
Yes. I found it concerning. Passages Jun 21 #3

Passages

(698 posts)
1. It is a relief Gorsuch saw it this way.
Fri Jun 21, 2024, 08:48 AM
Jun 21

Although it did not persuade the conservative majority, he did get it right.

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Supreme Court rules again...