Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(72,013 posts)
Sun Jun 16, 2024, 02:12 PM Jun 2024

Missouri abortion ban wasn't about lawmakers imposing religious beliefs, judge says






Missouri abortion ban wasn't about lawmakers imposing religious beliefs, judge says
Judge rejects argument lawmakers intended to “impose their religious beliefs.”




https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/judge-rejects-religious-leaders-challenge-missouri-abortion-ban-111157417
By HEATHER HOLLINGSWORTH Associated Press


June 15, 2024, 3:19 PM



A judge in Missouri says lawmakers who passed a restrictive abortion ban were not trying to impose their religious beliefs on everyone in the state, rejecting a case filed by more than a dozen Christian, Jewish and Unitarian Universalist leaders who support abortion rights.

The groups sought a permanent injunction last year barring Missouri from enforcing its abortion law and a declaration that provisions violate the state Constitution.

One section of the statute at issue reads: “In recognition that Almighty God is the author of life, that all men and women are ‘endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among those are Life.’”

Judge Jason Sengheiser said in his ruling Friday that there is similar language in the preamble to the Missouri Constitution, which expresses “profound reverence for the Supreme Ruler of the Universe.” The rest of the challenged provisions contain no explicit religious language, he said..................




3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Missouri abortion ban wasn't about lawmakers imposing religious beliefs, judge says (Original Post) riversedge Jun 2024 OP
Judge needs a visit from some Rabbis, Attilatheblond Jun 2024 #1
Some horny Hare Krishnas, too. tirebiter Jun 2024 #2
I think a few Pagans, slightlv Jun 2024 #3

Attilatheblond

(3,699 posts)
1. Judge needs a visit from some Rabbis,
Sun Jun 16, 2024, 02:18 PM
Jun 2024

maybe a dozen covens of strong willed Wiccans, and a bus load of Satanists with law degrees.

slightlv

(3,727 posts)
3. I think a few Pagans,
Sun Jun 16, 2024, 09:30 PM
Jun 2024

and most definitely a Satanism sect would like to pay them a visit, as well. And if it's not based on their religion, then make them explain *extremely* explicitly how they came to this conclusion, and upon what scientific research they base this upon? Because if it's not based in science, it's necessarily based on their view of religion, and they ARE forcing that view on everyone, whether or not it offends or denigrates anyone else's religious path.

I think they just gave us a heads up on how they're going to start framing the laws making us into a theocracy. Hmm... a theocracy not based on a particular religious viewpoint? Bull crap! As soon as it gets it's foot in the door, they'll literally be killing each other to be "top god" in the U.S.

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»Missouri abortion ban was...