Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Hunter Biden Prosecutors Might've Already Lost the Jury
Shan WuThe Hunter Biden trial starting in Wilmington, Delaware, is a poster-child case for potential jury nullification.
Biden, the only surviving son of President Joe Biden, is being tried for possessing a firearm while being a user of illegal drugs or drug addict and for lying about the same on a purchase form when he bought a gun. On the surface, the prosecutiona culmination of more than a half-decade of investigation by Special Counsel David Weisswould appear to have a slam dunk case because there is no real dispute he bought the gun, or that he had a drug addiction around the time he bought the gun.
But beneath the surface, the case is ripe for the phenomenon of jury nullification.
The strict definition of jury nullification is when a jury has determined that a defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubtbut either rejects the evidence or refuses to apply the law because the jury wants to send a message about some social issue that is larger than the case itself, or because the result dictated by law is contrary to the jurys sense of justice, morality, or fairness.
Lets be clear. Juries are not supposed to do that. They are supposed to convict if the evidence proves guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and acquit if it doesnt.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/hunter-biden-prosecutors-mightve-already-lost-the-jury?ref=home
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 1174 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (16)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hunter Biden Prosecutors Might've Already Lost the Jury (Original Post)
Jilly_in_VA
Jun 2024
OP
I keep saying it's just Hunter just this one time. How many gun MAGAts want stricter enforcement of that law?
brewens
Jun 2024
#1
brewens
(15,002 posts)1. I keep saying it's just Hunter just this one time. How many gun MAGAts want stricter enforcement of that law?
I'd apply it to alcohol junkies too and a DUI or drunken domestic violence could cost you your guns and possible prison time. Try passing that!
Probatim
(2,896 posts)2. Well the prosecutor already lost Lindsey Graham.
I can easily see the jury acquitting Biden in this case.
CrispyQ
(37,603 posts)4. Maga heads will explode! 💥
I'm gonna pick up some of those plastic drop cloths when I'm out this afternoon.
Probatim
(2,896 posts)5. BiDeN RiGGeD the Joory!!!
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(112,790 posts)7. And a pretty sound it will be
patricia92243
(12,780 posts)3. Juries are made up of people who have had the heartbreak of addiction in
their family or their friends. If the prosecution think Hunter will get any thing but sympathy, they are nuts. Also, I understand that he had just completed some sort of program to help himself and did not consider himself an addict at that time.
Wonder Why
(4,300 posts)6. There is nothing that forces them to convict or judge the defendant guilty or not proven guilty in the Sixth Amendment
Sixth Amendment
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.
LetMyPeopleVote
(152,006 posts)8. Abbe Lowell is evidently doing a good job