To the Supreme Court's shame, it has no sense of it
By Jesse Wegman / The New York Times
An earlier generation of Supreme Court justices seemed to possess the capacity for shame.
In 1969, Justice Abe Fortas resigned his seat for accepting a $20,000 consulting fee (which he returned) from a foundation led by a man who was convicted of securities fraud.
Whatever Fortas believed about his honor and morality, he understood that the Supreme Court is an inherently fragile institution and that its nine justices cannot afford the slightest whiff of bias or corruption. As The New York Times editorial board wrote then, A judge not only has to be innocent of any wrongdoing but he also has to be above reproach. Placing the courts and the countrys interests above his own, Fortas stepped down.
That sort of humility is nowhere in evidence on todays court, which is finding new ways to embarrass itself, thanks largely to the brazen behavior of two of its most senior members, Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, who are making a mockery of their obligation to at least appear neutral and independent. They fail to report large gifts, luxury vacations and payments to their family members by wealthy donors, at least one of whom had business before the court, and they express nakedly partisan opinions or fail to adequately distance themselves when their spouses express such views.
https://www.heraldnet.com/opinion/wegman-to-the-supreme-courts-shame-it-has-no-sense-of-it/