Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Time is up for neoliberals - Joseph Stiglitz - WaPo
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/05/13/stiglitz-captialism-economics-democracy-book/Shared: https://wapo.st/3wy6NKy
Democracy requires a new, progressive capitalism.
Amid another election season, our impulse to debate American democracy through a single political lens is understandable. But wed be better served considering a second closely related question too: Which economic system serves the most people?
On one side of the economic debate are those who believe in largely unfettered markets, in which companies are allowed to agglomerate market power or pollute or exploit. They believe firms should maximize shareholder value, doing whatever they can get away with, because bigger profits serve the common good.
The most famous 20th-century proponents of this low-tax/low-regulation shareholder-centric economy, often referred to as neoliberalism, are Milton Friedman and Friedrich Hayek. These Nobel Prize-winning economists took the idea beyond the economy, claiming this kind of economic system was necessary to achieve political freedom.
They worried about the growth of government in the aftermath of the Great Depression, when under the influence of John Maynard Keynes, the state was taking on new responsibilities to stabilize the economy. In Capitalism and Freedom, Friedman argued that free markets were indispensable to ensure political freedom. In Hayeks words, government overreach would lead us down The Road to Serfdom.
Weve now had four decades of the neoliberal experiment, beginning with Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher. The results are clear. Neoliberalism expanded the freedom of corporations and billionaires to do as they will and amass huge fortunes, but it also exacted a steep price: the well-being and freedom of the rest of society.
Amid another election season, our impulse to debate American democracy through a single political lens is understandable. But wed be better served considering a second closely related question too: Which economic system serves the most people?
On one side of the economic debate are those who believe in largely unfettered markets, in which companies are allowed to agglomerate market power or pollute or exploit. They believe firms should maximize shareholder value, doing whatever they can get away with, because bigger profits serve the common good.
The most famous 20th-century proponents of this low-tax/low-regulation shareholder-centric economy, often referred to as neoliberalism, are Milton Friedman and Friedrich Hayek. These Nobel Prize-winning economists took the idea beyond the economy, claiming this kind of economic system was necessary to achieve political freedom.
They worried about the growth of government in the aftermath of the Great Depression, when under the influence of John Maynard Keynes, the state was taking on new responsibilities to stabilize the economy. In Capitalism and Freedom, Friedman argued that free markets were indispensable to ensure political freedom. In Hayeks words, government overreach would lead us down The Road to Serfdom.
Weve now had four decades of the neoliberal experiment, beginning with Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher. The results are clear. Neoliberalism expanded the freedom of corporations and billionaires to do as they will and amass huge fortunes, but it also exacted a steep price: the well-being and freedom of the rest of society.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 741 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (20)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Time is up for neoliberals - Joseph Stiglitz - WaPo (Original Post)
erronis
May 2024
OP
Mme. Defarge
(8,412 posts)1. Read this earlier and I highly recommend it!
Freedom involves mot just freedom to, but freedom from - as in from want and fear.
wendyb-NC
(3,662 posts)2. Low income, poverty
Low wealth limits ones ability to take advantage of opportunities for positive change in their lives, manifesting their dreams, poverty isn't freedom.
Passages
(698 posts)3. He is brilliant and he would have made a great president.
I don't think he ever expressed that interest, but I wish he had run earlier in is life.