The Next Phase of the Immigration Crackdown Is Quieter -- and More Destabilizing
Source: NYTimes
...
Gone for now are the concentrated surges into American cities leading to dramatic and sometimes deadly clashes between immigration agents and protesters. Mass raids of Home Depot parking lots in search of undocumented day laborers are no longer routine. Immigration enforcement officials continue to deport nearly 1,000 people a day, many of them with no criminal record. But the Trump administration is also ramping up another strategy: to take apart immigrants lives, piece by piece, until they decide to leave the country altogether.
In February, the Department of Housing and Urban Development proposed a new federal rule blocking mixed status families from living in publicly subsidized housing, which could cause an estimated 80,000 people to lose their homes, including about 37,000 children, nearly all of them U.S. citizens. March, roughly 200,000 immigrants began losing their commercial drivers licenses, under a new ban on truckers who are asylum seekers, refugees or undocumented immigrants who arrived as children. The Trump administration has reportedly weighed an order that would require banks to verify their customers citizenship status. Access to capital has already been curtailed. Starting last month, noncitizens can no longer obtain small business loans through the federal government, even if they are here legally.
Stephen Miller, the architect of Trumps anti-immigration agenda, is lobbying Republican-led states to cut off services. In a meeting last month in Washington, he asked Texas lawmakers why they had not already passed a bill ending public education funding for undocumented children.
...
As the Trump administration shifts its strategy away from audacious, citywide raids, it seeks to apply pressure at every point of contact between immigrants and the government, using the countrys vast bureaucracy. But the most important tool for encouraging self-deportation today is the same as it was more than a century ago: fear.
Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/04/10/magazine/self-deportation-ice.html?unlocked_article_code=1.Z1A._Gx1.4tLPBgBOFHIE&smid=url-share
My heart is sinking. I fear the cruelty of these "quieter" tactics is failing to motivate the powerful opposition needed. Lives are being devastated. And not just those of the immigrants that are having their lives torn apart and their legal status stripped.
CharleyDog
(820 posts)that in the future we have deep empathy, and reparations, for the people we are torturing. The Statue of Liberty stands for immigrants. If they tear it down, WE WILL ERECT IT AGAIN.
pnwmom
(110,273 posts)and they can all be kicked out of subsidized housing because of that.
pat_k
(13,453 posts)However, if a family member has TPS status, they are included as members of the family who can live in public housing, but benefits exclude them as beneficiaries (i.e., subsidy is reduced or subsidized rent is prorated to exclude them).
Currently, I think undocumented immigrants are also permitted to live in public housing with eligible family, but rent is likewise prorated to exclude them.
At least that's how I understand it.
So yes, if abuela is undocumented or TPS, under the rule change, she won't be able live with eligible family in public or subsidized housing. I guess either they all go (if her presence is essential to the family functioning as a family) or she must go (which is undoubtedly impossible for most).
Add to that the fact the felon's regime is hellbent on stripping legal status from people who are documented as asylum seekers or TPS. As far as I can tell, the goal is to turn these documented immigrants into undocumented immigrants by fiat.
Some, but not all, of these actions to strip legal status are blocked as they work their way to SCOTUS.
Given that the felon's ICE and border patrol are already denying due process (that even SCOTUS affirmed) as a matter of course, we are in a lawless, amoral, and deeply Un-American place.
Tragically, even rights affirmed are denied to all but those who manage to get access to a lawyer (which is also denied as a matter of course). And even the few who manage to secure representation have an obscenely unjust and lengthy process to navigate to even attempt to secure their right to due process.
The point is to render people so afraid of being picked up and sent to detention, or so hopeless and immobilized in detention -- with moldly food, tainted food, and rampant infectious disease -- they don't even try to stand up for themselves.
CaliforniaPeggy
(156,652 posts)Bayard
(29,844 posts)