Hegseth says Iran won't be a 'politically correct' war as he lays out US objectives: 'No democracy-building exercise'
Source: The Independent
Monday 02 March 2026 11:05 EST
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth championed President Donald Trumps strikes on Iran in a press conference Monday morning, refuting concerns from the fake news media and political left that the conflict would lead to an endless war. To the media outlets and political left screaming endless wars, stop. This is not Iraq. This is not endless, Hegseth said. Our generation knows better and so does this president.
The defense secretary insisted the strikes, which have led to a deadly exchange of fire in the region, would prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon and harming more Americans, even as the operation has already killed four service members. Hegseth pushed back on other assertions about Trumps motivation in conducting the strikes, saying America was doing things on our terms.
No stupid rules of engagement, no nation-building quagmire, no democracy-building exercise, no politically-correct wars. We fight to win, Hegseth said. Striking a dogmatic tone, Hegseth praised U.S. partners who supported the mission, unlike so many of our traditional allies, who wring their hands and clutch their pearls, hemming and hawing about the use of force.
But when pressed with further questions about the goal of the operation, how many U.S. troops were involved and when officials anticipated its end, Hegseth declined to answer, taking up a more familiar tone toward the media. "I heard the question: about four weeks, Hegseth said, referring to a reporters query about whether the operation would take four weeks.
Read more: https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/iran-strikes-trump-hegseth-speech-b2930211.html
Blues Heron
(8,595 posts)Munu
(188 posts)Hegseth actually said something I believe this time.
Democracy? Pffft! Isn't there some would be crown prince waiting in the wings?
markodochartaigh
(5,358 posts)It was an exercise in anti-democracy when the US deposed the democratically elected leader Mossadegh and installed the shah. It was also an anti-democratic exercise (in Iran and in the US) when Reagan's henchmen negotiated with the mullahs to hold the US hostages until he had won the presidency.
If Kegsbreath said 2+2=4 I would agree with him, even though being on the same side of anything with him is uncomfortable for me.
SamuelTheThird
(848 posts)Which spawns the Shiite version of ISIS, only with a lot more resources
Zorro
(18,547 posts)niyad
(131,447 posts)CousinIT
(12,451 posts)at home or abroad. Same with rules of engagement.
All of that is just too "woke" for the MAGAManosphere.
sop
(18,243 posts)Supreme Leader and set up a constitutional monarchy, like his dead father? Will Iran become a secular democracy like it was under Mohammad Mosaddegh, Iran's last elected leader, who was overthrown by the CIA in 1953? Will the religious extremists retain power? Or will it be absolute chaos?
EX500rider
(12,346 posts)Mohammad Mosaddegh was just the Prime Minister.
Also he was not the shinning beacon of democracy many seem to think.
Since his support was mostly urban he tried to put illiterate voters were into a separate category from literate voters and which would have increased the representation of the urban population.
He also ending the 1952 election before rural votes could be fully counted.
According to historian Ervand Abrahamian: "Realizing that the opposition would take the vast majority of the provincial seats, Mosaddegh stopped the voting as soon as 79 deputiesjust enough to form a parliamentary quorumhad been elected.
He also introduced a single-clause bill to parliament to grant him emergency "dictatorial decree" powers for six months to pass "any law he felt necessary for obtaining not only financial solvency, but also electoral, judicial, and educational reforms.
In January 1953, successfully pressing Parliament to extend his emergency powers for another 12 months.
Mosaddegh attempted to abolish Iran's centuries-old feudal agriculture sector by replacing it with a system of collective farming and government land ownership, which also centralized power in his government.
A large part of his support was the Tudeh Party, a Iranian Marxist-Leninist communist party supporting Moscow's aims, not a popular move in the west during the Cold War.
Lonestarblue
(13,408 posts)I guess not following the rules of war is why the US killed 150 girls by bombing their school.
GenThePerservering
(3,221 posts)This failed weekend talking head hasn't the faintest idea what he's doing.
Get your drunken ass out there Hegseth if you're so horny for a war.
Hugin
(37,744 posts)Thats how F-15s get shot down by friendly fire.
Hic!breath is unusually pathetic.
GenThePerservering
(3,221 posts)And yeah - I suppose scores of dead children proves his 'warrior ethic'.
JT45242
(3,983 posts)Internationally -- it is a war crime.
But it seems like that is a violation of the military code of conduct
liberalgunwilltravel
(1,162 posts)Became intimately familiar with the practice of fragging. It was all the rage in Vietnam.
pat_k
(12,996 posts)With no objective, beyond bombing the shit out of the country as a monumentally corrupt payoff to MBS and Netanyahu in exchange for billions shovelled into the felon's pockets, what exactly does "winning" even mean, you racist moron fuck?
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100221061085
pfitz59
(12,580 posts)Win what. If he had attended war college he would have learned about Otto von Bismarck and 'limited war'. Or perhaps about the Peloponnesian War where victory ultimately led to defeat. He's an idiot and a fool.
Eugene
(67,024 posts)This is the freedom Dump is asking the Iranian people to rise up for?
Even from an amoral realpolitik angle, this statement is breathtakingly stupid.
twodogsbarking
(18,302 posts)mdbl
(8,479 posts)twodogsbarking
(18,302 posts)vanessa_ca
(719 posts)Im sure the global pedophile cabal which has wrought terror across the globe will get it right this time.
Grins
(9,385 posts)A (one of many) problem with stunted, smug, pig-ignorant wretches like Trump, Hegseth, and Rubio (even back to Bush II), is they never answer the next question: "And then what?" "What happens after you think you have "won?" And won what?
Marie Marie
(11,153 posts)How could Congress have approved this nasty, delusional drunk for Sec of DEFENSE (I refuse to call it by his new, tougher name!!)?
alfredo
(60,282 posts)BumRushDaShow
(168,263 posts)I am shocked that it wasn't dropped on a Friday where it could have been lost over the weekend but I think Epstein suddenly became a "distraction" from the no-plan disaster with Iran.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(134,646 posts)Ilikepurple
(546 posts)Hard to argue with a point of view thats built on contradictions once tolerated. It seems that the administration is building an entirely new rational for aggression and expansion. Sort of like manifest destiny, but without the feigned morality. Man Fest destiny.
fujiyamasan
(1,511 posts)Something woke, DEI, blah blah blah.
The question I have is simple
whats the actual plan Hogshit?? What is victory in this case? You kinda need to define that. So was the objective regime change? If Khananei is dead why is this still a war then? Are you expecting a formal surrender?
From what I recall it didnt take long to depose Iraqs government either. Given the DOD has a budget of nearly a trillion dollars, Id expect it to be a walk in the park to take out weak paper tiger militaries.
genxlib
(6,115 posts)He is a walking talking war crime.
Bayard
(29,264 posts)Once again, I believe this is about the oil, by any means necessary.
C_U_L8R
(49,245 posts)Hegseth just oozes incompetence... or is that the cheap scotch?
His tirades are simply ridiculous. How can the Generals put up with this putz?
Klarkashton
(5,140 posts)City Lights
(25,618 posts)They would figure out a way to screw up a one-car funeral.
Elect a clown; expect a circus.