CBS Denies Forcing Stephen Colbert to Not Air Interview With Democratic Candidate, Says It Provided 'Legal Guidance'
Source: Variety
Feb 17, 2026 11:51am PT
CBS said it did not force The Late Show With Stephen Colbert to pull an interview with Texas state Rep. James Talarico from its TV broadcast Monday, contrary to the way the late-night host had framed it. Rather, according to CBS, its legal team provided guidance to The Late Show that Talaricos appearance could trigger the FCCs equal-time rule.
In a statement Tuesday, CBS said, The Late Show was not prohibited by CBS from broadcasting the interview with Rep. James Talarico. The show was provided legal guidance that the broadcast could trigger the FCC equal-time rule for two other candidates, including Rep. Jasmine Crockett, and presented options for how the equal time for other candidates could be fulfilled. The Late Show decided to present the interview through its YouTube channel with on-air promotion on the broadcast rather than potentially providing the equal-time options.
On Mondays episode of The Late Show, Colbert said CBS lawyers had blocked him from airing an interview with Texas state Rep. James Talarico, who is running for U.S. Senate, over the FCCs recent warning that it would consider enforcing the agencys equal time political rules for late-night and daytime talks shows. Colbert also claimed the networks legal team told the host specifically to not to discuss the matter on air.
Talerico was supposed to be here, but we were told in no uncertain terms by our networks lawyers, who called us directly, that we could not have him on the broadcast, Colbert said on the show. Then I was told in some uncertain terms that not only could I not have him on, I could not mention me not having him on. And because my network clearly doesnt want us to talk about this, lets talk about this.
Read more: https://variety.com/2026/tv/news/cbs-denies-stephen-colbert-forced-not-air-talarico-interview-fcc-equal-time-1236665701/
Full headline: CBS Denies Forcing Stephen Colbert to Not Air Interview With Democratic Candidate, Says It Provided Legal Guidance About FCC Equal-Time Rule
Here comes the finger-pointing after the blow back.
Lovie777
(22,385 posts)Deuxcents
(26,208 posts)Upthevibe
(10,129 posts)lapucelle
(20,985 posts)to having the other two Texas Democratic primary candidates on his show.
BumRushDaShow
(167,626 posts)on consecutive shows so they each would have the "full time" during that show's segment, to make remarks and respond to his questions, instead of having what would amount to a crowd of competing voices on at the same time in a limited time slot.
travelingthrulife
(4,885 posts)lapucelle
(20,985 posts)The View also had Crockett on, but it was before the FCC issued it's new "guidance".
https://archive.ph/baFgZ
Crowman2009
(3,462 posts)I don't give a damn the Conniving Backstabbing Sonsabitches network executives have to say.
Marcuse
(8,859 posts)travelingthrulife
(4,885 posts)I really wish they were running in different districts so both could win.
Grokenstein
(6,311 posts)I'll take Colbert's word over Weiss' any day.
ificandream
(11,796 posts)Susan Calvin
(2,421 posts)That's why I record it every night and watch it in the morning.
popsdenver
(1,968 posts)So then, no problem running it in it's entirety CBS..............
turbinetree
(27,298 posts)November cannot get here fast enough....................
Grim Chieftain
(1,478 posts)Stephen Colbert or CBS...?
YodaMom2
(165 posts)I dont believe a word CBS (aka Bari Weiss) says. Theyre denying because they didnt expect a) for Colbert to call them out, even though they explicitly told him not to talk about it, b) for Colbert to actually proceed with the interview and post it on YouTube, c) for millions to have already viewed it less than 24 hrs later, and d) for the intensity of the blowback.
bluestarone
(21,747 posts)Run it on PRIME TIME twice.
Susan Calvin
(2,421 posts)SSJVegeta
(2,565 posts)FakeNoose
(40,938 posts)However I believe it was actually recorded earlier ... like maybe a week or so earlier? I don't know this for sure, but Colbert had last week off, and the James Talarico interview segment was done before a live audience.
So maybe what happened is this: the live show was taped around 5 p.m. and then it was edited before CBS put on the air over a week ago. The Talarico segment was taken out and Colbert raised a stink about it with management afterwards. He was told he can't broadcast it on CBS, but he can use it on his own podcast. That's basically what he did, however he revealed all of this last night during the Late Show.
The show is taped around 5 p.m. so it didn't all happen on the SAME DAY. How could the segment have been edited, and the meeting taking place, and Colbert talking about it on the air at 11:30 last night? Not unless this is "Back to the Future" Part Z.
Mblaze
(948 posts)Volaris
(11,565 posts)Well, we were never trying specifically to keep the horse IN the barn, that's why we left the door open. The horse you see, CHOSE to leave...nothin u can do about that,
is there? TAKE THAT, LIBS.
ToxMarz
(2,836 posts)BaronChocula
(4,265 posts)how networks execs were selling out the First Amendment to curry favor with corrupt politicians to which Colbert responded
"To fact-check you, my network said our cancellation was a purely financial decision and I remain grateful for the last eleven years."
It seems that he was covering legal bases, but it also seemed like a dig. Sometimes you can't tell with Colbert. Part of his genius?
nwduke
(495 posts)Doing a side gig and providing CBS with legal advice?🤪😂
evemac
(295 posts)What a load of BS
LiberalLovinLug
(14,623 posts)Then they fulfill the edict of having on reps from both parties.
Shrek
(4,406 posts)From the linked article:
The show was provided legal guidance that the broadcast could trigger the FCC equal-time rule for two other candidates, including Rep. Jasmine Crockett, and presented options for how the equal time for other candidates could be fulfilled.
BidenRocks
(3,010 posts)what are you doing?
I no longer bother with anything with a cbs byline.
Martin68
(27,384 posts)mitch96
(15,738 posts)RainCaster
(13,510 posts)Smells like shit
Sounds like shit
I don't need to taste it to know it's shit
Deminpenn
(17,353 posts)the viewers, and eventually advertisers will flee, too.
