Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(165,791 posts)
Thu Jan 8, 2026, 05:20 PM 17 hrs ago

Trump instructs 'representatives' to buy $200 billion in mortgage bonds, aiming to lower rates

Source: CNBC

Published Thu, Jan 8 2026 4:37 PM EST Updated 13 Min Ago


President Donald Trump on Thursday said he is “instructing my Representatives” to buy $200 billion in mortgage bonds, claiming that doing so will drive rates and monthly payments down.

Trump, in a Truth Social post, said he was issuing that directive because Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two government-sponsored mortgage-issuing entities, are flush with cash. It was unclear who Trump is referring to as his representatives. The White House and the Federal Housing Finance Agency did not immediately respond to CNBC’s requests for clarity.

Trump claimed in the post that the move would help restore “affordability,” a word that has become key to Democrats’ political messaging as they accuse the Republican president of failing to address high prices.

The president heaped criticism on the administration of his predecessor, Joe Biden, claiming that he had “ignored the Housing Market” amid a slew of other policy failures.

Read more: https://www.cnbc.com/2026/01/08/trump-mortgage-bonds-rates-fannie-freddie.html

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump instructs 'representatives' to buy $200 billion in mortgage bonds, aiming to lower rates (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 17 hrs ago OP
could not be more out of touch Nigrum Cattus 16 hrs ago #1
So don't buy a median price home. Igel 14 hrs ago #2
whatever happened to reasonably-sized homes Skittles 12 hrs ago #4
This would help set us up for an even worse crash. snot 13 hrs ago #3
This puts Freddie and Fannie at risk, but oh well, nothing bad has happened yet lately progree 11 hrs ago #5
My proposal has been Puppyjive 5 hrs ago #6

Igel

(37,369 posts)
2. So don't buy a median price home.
Thu Jan 8, 2026, 08:26 PM
14 hrs ago

But one that's under median. Even way under. I mean, I feel humiliated, my house is $200k under 'median'.

What, that's really low on the totem pole.

And yet, this substandard housing is completely survivable ... for the last 16 years. I raised my kid here. Grew sunchokes and tomatoes and satsumas and limes and raised some pretty nifty succulents here. And even appreciate some of my neighbors.

The problem is "US median." Nobody lives in a US where we think of ourselves as between a town in eastern Oregon and Holmsby Hills, or Ozona and Short Hills (NJ). And those high-end digs in areas I'm 1200 miles from really pull up the median.

Mean (not "median&quot for TX is $296,039--that includees mansions in River Oaks and hoity-toity areas of Austin, as well as podunk San Saba and Ozona. For Harris County, TX, home of Houston, the median is $310,000. But still, a decent study out of London years ago said that housing was pro-rated for commute time in an absolutely linear fashion, with commuting expenses on the x-axis, which is a reasonable thing to price into housing pricing. So I don't work downtown where wages are huge so I don't want to pay a commuter premium. For Spring, TX ... My neck of the woods ... median is $263,000. The Woodlands, 20 minutes, north ... $575,000, but it's an secondary city--Houston's sprawly enough that there's a business downtown, a medical downtown an energy downtown ... Woodlands is its own economic center.

Holmsby Hills (in Los Angeles, making Beverly Hills look low rent) and Short Hills aren't in my commuting area. I seldom get up to The Woodlands or down to Royal Oaks.

My house isn't $200k below median. It's just about median. Purchasing parity power rules. What I buy for $100 in Tomball Texas isn't what I can get for $100 in Manhattan or $100 in Marysville, TN or Fredericksburg TX.

The use of medians and averages by country and not locality distort things quite a bit.

snot

(11,512 posts)
3. This would help set us up for an even worse crash.
Thu Jan 8, 2026, 09:36 PM
13 hrs ago

I saw something about someone proposing to restrict companies from buying up single family homes for speculative or investment purposes – that's a measure that might actually help; wish it had been imposed BEFORE prices were driven up.

progree

(12,741 posts)
5. This puts Freddie and Fannie at risk, but oh well, nothing bad has happened yet lately
Thu Jan 8, 2026, 11:24 PM
11 hrs ago

from AP:
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-says-wants-government-buy-214700427.html

. . . Trump said the two mortgage companies under government conservatorship, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, have $200 billion in cash that will be used to make the purchase.
. . .
Daryl Fairweather, chief economist at the real estate brokerage Redfin. Fairweather estimated the government purchases of mortgage debt could shave 0.25 to 0.5 percentage points off the rate for a 30-year fixed rate mortgage. But the purchases wouldn’t address other factors such as a chronic shortage of homes on the market,
. . .
There is also a risk because Trump would be spending the cash reserves that are supposed to help be a buffer against an economic downturn akin to what happened during the Great Recession. In a sense, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae could be more vulnerable if anything negative happens to the housing market,
(emphasis added)

Apparently, only timid sissy men worry about risk and woke concepts like reserves in banking and lending. I say full speed ahead, we can always blame Fed Chair Powell if anything goes wrong (sarc)

Puppyjive

(918 posts)
6. My proposal has been
Fri Jan 9, 2026, 05:50 AM
5 hrs ago

To stick it to the investors and landlords, specifically out of state investors. They do not care what they do to our communities by driving up the price of rent. They don't live here. A three tier tax system should be put in place. Tier one, if you live out of state Tier 2, if you live out of county, and tier 3 if you live out of the city. The farther away, the more you pay. And the more you jack up the price, the more tax you will pay. And yes, the median price is not in line with the median income. I would also like to see appraisers and realtors unable to collaborate. The way they do their market analysis is unfair.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump instructs 'represen...