Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(153,401 posts)
Fri May 9, 2025, 11:17 AM May 9

'Dismantling one of the strongest tools we have': Conservatives fret HHS cuts

Source: Politico

05/09/2025 05:00 AM EDT


The Trump administration’s decision to gut reproductive health research is alarming some conservatives, who worry it undercuts the president’s pro-family agenda. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. laid off thousands of federal employees last month, including about 80 who worked at the Centers for Disease Control’s Division of Reproductive Health, according to three former CDC staffers granted anonymity to speak candidly on agency dynamics.

The office collected state and national data on live births, abortion trends and fertility treatment outcomes — the kind of information policymakers rely on to assess and improve maternal and infant health care, said Isaac Michael, a former HHS statistician who worked on the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System before he was laid off.

“If you cut PRAMS, this is dismantling one of the strongest tools we have to prevent maternal deaths, to reduce infant mortality and to close socioeconomic health gaps,” he said.

Michael — who said he voted for President Donald Trump in 2024 based on his anti-abortion stance and supports the president’s push to rein in federal spending — said ending PRAMS contradicts the administration’s pro-family messaging. By tracking maternal health behaviors before, during and after pregnancy, Michael said the PRAMS team helped identify health disparities, evaluate the effectiveness of Medicaid and Women, Infant and Children (WIC) programs for pregnant people and understand causes of preterm birth and infant death. “Without it, we are flying blind,” Michael said. “We lose the ability to see where we are failing mothers and babies until it’s too late.”

Read more: https://www.politico.com/news/2025/05/09/hhs-cuts-pregnancy-data-00336938



They don't care about "families" or "babies" or women for that matter.

Another "Cut everything but MY stuff" ass. It's FAFO Mr. Michael.
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

atreides1

(16,662 posts)
1. My message to Mr. Isaac Michael
Fri May 9, 2025, 11:21 AM
May 9

He was happy to fuck people over because of his beliefs, now Isaac Michael can go fuck himself!!!

Leghorn21

(13,884 posts)
3. My simple message is ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
Fri May 9, 2025, 11:34 AM
May 9

HA HA HA YOU STUPID FUCK

Midnight Writer

(24,057 posts)
4. They want to see our maternal mortality go up? Is this an Elon agenda or an RFK, Jr. agenda?
Fri May 9, 2025, 11:48 AM
May 9

Our maternal mortality rate is already higher than most industrialized countries.

bronxiteforever

(10,461 posts)
5. GOP states like Texas support initiatives
Fri May 9, 2025, 11:58 AM
May 9

that kill pregnant women. They will ring their hands for the cameras while stepping over the corpses.

rubbersole

(9,872 posts)
6. That money can be better spent...
Fri May 9, 2025, 12:44 PM
May 9

...on billionaires' tax cuts/government contracts. Stop whining. Go play with your two dolls and take vitamin A for those spots on your kids.

SupportSanity

(1,446 posts)
11. PRAMS tool: "prevent maternal deaths, to reduce infant mortality and to close socioeconomic health gaps"
Fri May 9, 2025, 02:54 PM
May 9

PRAMS tool:

prevent maternal deaths (that's women)

to reduce infant mortality (half would be female)

close socioeconomic health gaps (benefitting women)

So, shutting down PRAMS is a win from their point of view.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»'Dismantling one of the s...