Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(153,479 posts)
Sat May 3, 2025, 12:35 PM May 3

After paying people to leave, one federal agency is scrambling to fill positions

Source: NPR

May 3, 2025 6:00 AM ET


As the Trump administration marches forward with its plan to dramatically slash the federal workforce, agencies are bidding farewell to employees who have agreed to resign now in exchange for pay and benefits through September. But at least one agency, the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), is already scrambling to fill some of those newly vacant roles, according to internal communications seen by NPR.

On Thursday, a day after the departure of hundreds of employees who accepted the deferred resignation offer, remaining APHIS employees received an email from human resources announcing "lateral transfer opportunities." Qualified employees are invited to apply by Tuesday for 73 open positions "that are especially critical to fill as soon as possible," the email said.

The agency is looking for scientists, budget analysts, technicians, inspectors, and a veterinarian to carry out its mission to protect the health, welfare, and value of America's plants, animals, and natural resources. The immediate posting of these jobs has infuriated employees who took the deferred resignation offer out of fear that their positions would be eliminated.

"We are now all at home, being paid to stay home while they announce, less than 24 hours later, our jobs," said one APHIS employee who accepted deferred resignation and now sees their position on the list of openings. "What logic metric is being used to justify this?" The employee, whose role involved ensuring that agricultural commodities entering the U.S. are both legal and safe, agreed to speak with NPR on condition of anonymity out of fear of reprisal for speaking to the media.

Read more: https://www.npr.org/2025/05/03/nx-s1-5384961/usda-deferred-resignation-federal-workers-aphis



These DOGE people are a bunch of psychotic freaks.

APHIS is there at the seaports, airports, and border crossings (along with FDA) inspecting imported food products for insect infestations, etc, among many other duties.
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
After paying people to leave, one federal agency is scrambling to fill positions (Original Post) BumRushDaShow May 3 OP
Taxpayers pay for people to leave, and then pay them to come back. Irish_Dem May 3 #1
I assume the goal is to replace those people who took the offer with newly hired AZJonnie May 3 #11
New hires are expensive to train, there is a big learning curve. Irish_Dem May 3 #12
I was not meaning to imply it's meant to serve ANYONE's interest other than that of the Regime AZJonnie May 3 #18
I understand what you were saying and agreeing with you. Irish_Dem May 3 #19
In the end, costs will be higher because of their incompetence surfered May 3 #2
Exactly Rebl2 May 3 #3
Trump and Musk should pay for this!! riversedge May 3 #5
Makes my head spin MO_Dem May 3 #4
Who in their right mind would join FEDGOV now? COL Mustard May 3 #23
How many times has this happened now? sakabatou May 3 #6
tRump & eLoon will still claim $Billions saved to justify tax cuts for the wealthy groundloop May 3 #7
On the hook for two salaries In filling jobs that are open due to voluntary resignations, the government will effective riversedge May 3 #8
All in the name of "saving money." What idiots. Of course, another goal its to install loyalists in these positions. The Martin68 May 3 #9
This certainly seems like it could be a lawsuit. intheflow May 3 #10
I don't even know why there's an E in DOGE. Beartracks May 3 #13
Those folks and many others... Javaman May 3 #14
and they may decide to cut jobs again at some point. nt wiggs May 3 #15
Other countries aren't as stupid as the U.S. not fooled May 3 #16
That always happens after a purge of experienced people who cost mrre Warpy May 3 #17
K&R ReRe May 3 #20
The Bureaucracy Paradox Metaphorical May 3 #21
"However, the Federal government has always been run lean" BumRushDaShow May 3 #22

Irish_Dem

(70,218 posts)
1. Taxpayers pay for people to leave, and then pay them to come back.
Sat May 3, 2025, 12:37 PM
May 3

DOGE is really saving us money.

AZJonnie

(830 posts)
11. I assume the goal is to replace those people who took the offer with newly hired
Sat May 3, 2025, 02:12 PM
May 3

MAGA sycophant types, thinking it's statistically likely that a >50% number of the people who took the offer are in some way less enthusiastic about IQ47 vs who they might find to replace them. I mean, you're also right on the economic side cuz as we all know, DOGE is a scam.

Irish_Dem

(70,218 posts)
12. New hires are expensive to train, there is a big learning curve.
Sat May 3, 2025, 02:32 PM
May 3

And mistakes are made without adequate supervision.
Mistakes which cost time and money.

The cheapest way to do a job is to do it right the first time.

Who knew how expensive it is to save money.

AZJonnie

(830 posts)
18. I was not meaning to imply it's meant to serve ANYONE's interest other than that of the Regime
Sat May 3, 2025, 03:17 PM
May 3

What you said is of course also very true

Though presumably they're also going to pay the replacements a lot less.

Irish_Dem

(70,218 posts)
19. I understand what you were saying and agreeing with you.
Sat May 3, 2025, 03:24 PM
May 3

Fire federal employees and replace with MAGA cult members.

I was just pointing out the high cost of these so called cost saving measures.
A place run by cheap newbies ends up being quite expensive.

MO_Dem

(2,372 posts)
4. Makes my head spin
Sat May 3, 2025, 01:01 PM
May 3

Do I have this right?

1. Donnie 2 Dolls orders all federal employees working from home to return to offices or be fired because he said they were doing nothing

2. Then he starts paying people to stay home and do nothing.

3. Now he's hiring people to replace them? How long before they get sent home with pay to do nothing?

COL Mustard

(7,399 posts)
23. Who in their right mind would join FEDGOV now?
Sat May 3, 2025, 05:31 PM
May 3

You come in, you're on probation for a year, then 10-11 months later you get told "Sorry, you are terminated because of performance". Makes perfect sense, and by that I mean makes zero sense.

riversedge

(75,769 posts)
8. On the hook for two salaries In filling jobs that are open due to voluntary resignations, the government will effective
Sat May 3, 2025, 01:25 PM
May 3

The tax-payer is on the hook for these two salaries---damn.



...........On the hook for two salaries

In filling jobs that are open due to voluntary resignations, the government will effectively be on the hook for two salary-and-benefit packages through the end of September — one for the person newly moving into the job, and one for the person who was paid to leave that job.

It's not clear what will happen to the roles that are vacated by employees who move to the newly opened positions.

Martin68

(25,854 posts)
9. All in the name of "saving money." What idiots. Of course, another goal its to install loyalists in these positions. The
Sat May 3, 2025, 02:06 PM
May 3

fact that they re having difficulty filling positions suggests they can't find enough loyal people who want to work for them.

intheflow

(29,567 posts)
10. This certainly seems like it could be a lawsuit.
Sat May 3, 2025, 02:11 PM
May 3

I mean, coerced into leaving their jobs to save money and then seeing their jobs posted the next day? As Joe would say, c'mon, man!

Beartracks

(13,905 posts)
13. I don't even know why there's an E in DOGE.
Sat May 3, 2025, 02:32 PM
May 3

There's no Efficiency in what they do, in how they do it, or in the resulting mess.

==================

Javaman

(63,900 posts)
14. Those folks and many others...
Sat May 3, 2025, 02:33 PM
May 3

Will never come back or apply for those jobs as long as the orange asshole and empty husk (with his dogeteens) are in power.

We are entering into a very dark time of brain drain

not fooled

(6,296 posts)
16. Other countries aren't as stupid as the U.S.
Sat May 3, 2025, 02:35 PM
May 3

They want exports inspected and safeguarded so that US pests and diseases don't end up in their countries.

And, if this country weren't run by batshit crazy loons, USDA would have continued unimpeded to protect US agriculture.

Musk and red don are ignorant and insane.


Warpy

(113,465 posts)
17. That always happens after a purge of experienced people who cost mrre
Sat May 3, 2025, 02:55 PM
May 3

because they've been there long enough to be well trained in their jobs.

Corporation or government, it doesn't matter. Any outfit that tries to cut costs on the backs of labor soon finds itself in difficulty, more so than outfits that bit the bullet during lean times and kept experienced staff working.

New hires right out of school might look cheaper but they're not. They all cost money as they learn the job and come up to some sort of speed, especially with no one left to train them. Those actuarial tables so beloved by a certain type of management never seem to tell them that part and that type of management never seems to learn.

So ha ha on you, FAFO at its finest.

ReRe

(11,656 posts)
20. K&R
Sat May 3, 2025, 03:34 PM
May 3

Efficiency, my ass! Efficiency had nothing to do with what Musk, et al were up to. What they were up to was slash and burn at the speed of light, causing as much chaos as possible, while stealing the data Musk is going to become a trillionaire with.

Metaphorical

(2,415 posts)
21. The Bureaucracy Paradox
Sat May 3, 2025, 04:33 PM
May 3

I had two very interesting discussions this week.

The first was with a person working for the Government Printing Office (GPO) who has been trying to modernize (with only very limited success due to funding) a sixty year old printing system for Congress.

The other was with a MAGA who tried to talk about how everything was getting bureaucratized and the number of people who were involved in the bureaucracy were outnumbering those who did "productive" work (and of course, this was only in the government). He ran his own business, and was a fan of Trump's.

There's a certain willful blindness I see frequently working as a consultant. ALL organizations have bureaucracies. They evolve both because as organizations get larger, lines of communication and authority get to a point where someone needs to manage them, track them, and organize work. Most of the time, they are the silent glue that holds an organization together, and here, expertise becomes critical. Business owners of course see THEIR managers as being critical (in part because many of them CAME from management circles) but, because they see the government as a parasite on their ability to make a profit, they see any government employee (but in particular "The Bureaucracy&quot as being particularly egregious, because they see it as coming out of THEIR taxes.

There is a deeper factor there too. If someone owns a moderate to large company, they are used to privilege in their company. The government, however, does not privilege them (or at least they see it as not privileging them), and because they are not given due status in comparison to what they are used to, they feel offended that they are not given the respect that they are supposedly entitled to.

Especially with GS Contract Civil Service, most departments have very minimal budgets, and very strict rules on what those budgets can be used for. Their salaries are on the low end for people with equivalent skills and experiences. What they get in return typically has been a certain degree of job protection, but even that's been disappearing.

Musk upended the corporate world by firing most of the people working at Twitter. This was possible because the infrastructure was already there and fairly foolproofed by the time he took over, so he's been basically siphoning off technical capital without replacing it. Eventually the well will run dry there (I believe he had X.ai "buy" X( nee Twitter) primarily as an accounting dodge, not a technical merger, primarily to keep the company afloat long enough to sell it to the next fool). However, the Federal government has always been run lean, so functionality is going to start failing soon.

Ayn Rand has done more to poison Western Society than anyone on the planet.






BumRushDaShow

(153,479 posts)
22. "However, the Federal government has always been run lean"
Sat May 3, 2025, 04:41 PM
May 3

Years of "Do more with less", then "Do more with cuts", and finally, "Do more with nothing".

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»After paying people to le...