Supreme Court upholds TikTok ban, clears way for app to shut down in U.S. as soon as Sunday
Last edited Fri Jan 17, 2025, 12:06 PM - Edit history (1)
Source: CBS News
Updated on: January 17, 2025 / 11:31 AM EST
Washington The Supreme Court on Friday upheld a new law that would lead to a ban of the social media platform TikTok, clearing the way for the widely popular app to shutter in the U.S. as soon as Sunday.
"We conclude that the challenged provisions do not violate the petitioners' First Amendment rights," the court said in a unanimous unsigned opinion, which upholds the lower court decision against TikTok. Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Neil Gorsuch wrote separately, with Gorsuch agreeing with the outcome of the case but splitting with the court's reasoning.
The court's opinion comes days before the law, which was passed with bipartisan majorities of Congress last April, is set to take effect. TikTok and a group of content creators who use the app argued the law infringes on their free speech rights, and the Supreme Court heard arguments in their bid to block it one week ago.
"There is no doubt that, for more than 170 million Americans, TikTok offers a distinctive and expansive outlet for expression, means of engagement, and source of community. But Congress has determined that divestiture is necessary to address its well-supported national security concerns regarding TikTok's data collection practices and relationship with a foreign adversary," the court's opinion said.
Read more: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/supreme-court-tiktok-ban-ruling/
Article updated.
Previous article/headline -
Updated on: January 17, 2025 / 10:20 AM EST
Washington -- The Supreme Court on Friday upheld a new law that would lead to a ban of the social media platform TikTok, clearing the way for the widely popular app to shutter in the U.S. as soon as Sunday. "We conclude that the challenged provisions do not violate the petitioners' First Amendment rights," the court said in a unanimous unsigned opinion, which upholds the lower court decision against TikTok. Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Neil Gorsuch wrote separately.
The court's opinion comes days before the law, which was passed with bipartisan majorities of Congress last April, is set to take effect. TikTok and a group of content creators who use the app argued the law infringes on their free speech rights, and the Supreme Court heard arguments in their bid to block it one week ago.
"The challenged provisions further an important government interest unrelated to the suppression of free expression and do not burden substantially more speech than necessary to further that interest," the court said, adding that the law's requirements that TikTok either divest or face a ban are designed to prevent China from gaining access to the personal data from the app's U.S. users.
"There is no doubt that, for more than 170 million Americans, TikTok offers a distinctive and expansive outlet for expression, means of engagement, and source of community. But Congress has determined that divestiture is necessary to address its well-supported national security concerns regarding TikTok's data collection practices and relationship with a foreign adversary," the court's opinion said.
Original article -
Washington -- The Supreme Court on Friday upheld a new law that would lead to a ban of the social media platform TikTok, clearing the way for the widely popular app to be forced to shutter in the U.S. as soon as Sunday.
"We conclude that the challenged provisions do not violate the petitioners' First Amendment rights," the court said in a unanimous unsigned opinion, which upholds the lower court decision against TikTok.
The court's opinion comes days before the law, which was passed with bipartisan majorities of Congress last April, is set to take effect. TikTok and a group of content creators who use the app argued the law infringes on their free speech rights, and the Supreme Court heard arguments in their bid to block it one week ago.
This is a breaking news story and will be updated.
question everything
(49,297 posts)Bengus81
(7,586 posts)Got it..............
BumRushDaShow
(145,402 posts)Published Wed, Apr 24 2024 11:05 AM EDT Updated Wed, Apr 24 2024 12:49 PM EDT
(it was inserted in with the supplemental aid to Ukraine, Taiwan and Israel bill).
Bengus81
(7,586 posts)Anyway...he says he won't support the ban and is leaving it up to Trump who if I remember right wanted it gone and then reversed.
BumRushDaShow
(145,402 posts)And in the article I had linked to, there was this -
womanofthehills
(9,406 posts)Not exactly a group you want to make angry. Thousands are influencers making good incomes off TicToc.
LeftInTX
(31,336 posts)pimpbot
(1,032 posts)https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/security/us-officials-urge-americans-use-encrypted-apps-cyberattack-rcna182694
https://www.reuters.com/technology/cybersecurity/chinese-hackers-accessed-yellens-computer-us-treasury-breach-bloomberg-news-2025-01-17/
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-house-vote-provide-3-billion-remove-chinese-telecoms-equipment-2024-12-08/
Details on tiktok:
https://www.nytimes.com/article/tiktok-ban.html
mathematic
(1,536 posts)What dictators are going to be there? I see that Xi Jinping is sending an envoy and El Salvador's Bukele has been invited but has not stated if he's coming. The other invites I see are either people not in government, envoys, or simply legitimately democratically elected leaders DU doesn't like (Meloni, Milei). Orban was also invited and could arguably meet the criteria, though he hasn't confirmed he'll be there.
speak easy
(10,936 posts)TikTok will continue to be available in every other NATO country. The ban is a scam.
speak easy
(10,936 posts)Name another NATO country where TikTok is outright banned.
angrychair
(9,981 posts)In almost all those countries. Places like India and Nepal ban it because of their own issues with China but not the app per se.
This is the government banning a form of communication for the entire country for vague reasons at best. It's main complaint is something US social media companies do on the daily.
angrychair
(9,981 posts)In almost all those countries. Places like India and Nepal ban it because of their own issues with China but not the app per se.
This is the government banning a form of communication for the entire country for vague reasons at best. It's main complaint is something US social media companies do on the daily.
JoseBalow
(5,969 posts)Wiz Imp
(2,734 posts)Last edited Fri Jan 17, 2025, 01:29 PM - Edit history (1)
and not to mention Trump are against the ban, that tells me it absolutely should be banned.
Shockingly, Boebert voted in favor of the ban but most of the rest of the worst of the worst republicans who didn't vote no, just didn't vote at all.