House GOP's Budget Hawks Now Want A $4 Trillion Debt Limit Hike
Source: Huff Post
Jan 16, 2025, 11:41 AM EST
The House Freedom Caucus, a group of hard-right conservative and libertarian Republicans, wants a $4 trillion hike in the nations debt limit as part of the GOPs big but still-developing tax and spending cut plans.
A hike in the debt limit would allow the government to continue borrowing to repay past debts and keep it from defaulting on the current $36 trillion-plus in outstanding debt. A default by the U.S. on its debt would trigger catastrophic economic consequences, economists say.
In a social media post early Thursday, the Freedom Caucus proposed the $4 trillion hike as part of a package of spending increases for increased border security and boosting the Pentagons budget. They said the boost would allow borrowing for another two years. The group, which has long been a thorn in the side of House GOP leaders with its demands for more hard-line policies, said the hike would have to be accompanied by dollar-for-dollar spending cuts over 10 years.
Our proposal is a Republican plan that can reach 218 votes, that would allow us to keep the ball on the Republican side of the field for defense and non-defense appropriations ― while delivering wins and uniting the conference, the group said in its post.
Read more: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/house-gop-hardliners-want-4-trillion-debt-limit-hike_n_67891ba7e4b0ebaad44f0d20
BoRaGard
(3,494 posts)CaliforniaPeggy
(152,684 posts)Scrivener7
(53,502 posts)groundloop
(12,432 posts)Then blame Democrats for all the problems they caused.
keep_left
(2,593 posts)...as popularized by Thom Hartmann. ( Actually, Hartmann calls the dilemma "shooting Santa Claus" ). Chomsky refers to it as an intentional "fiscal trainwreck".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jude_Wanniski#The_Two_Santa_Claus_Theory
Ray Bruns
(4,809 posts)Money.
SWBTATTReg
(24,529 posts)use to stick into each other's faces when the debt limit is reaching its limit.
I'd say let the markets decide when the debt limit has been reached, and react accordingly, as the money markets usually do, when a company or such defaults on their obligations.
But Nooooo, they won't do this, they want to volleyball this issue back and forth. It's getting a little tiresome and old.
BComplex
(9,196 posts)Republicans always binge on a credit card, make the economy falsely appear like everyone's doing great, and then wait for the dems to clean up after them. The media has always ALWAYS credited them with the party they create, and never with the hole the republicans dig the country into.
neohippie
(1,178 posts)Extending Trumps tax cuts for the most wealthy costs the same amount $4 Trillion why didn't they notice that simple solution
Don't extend the tax cuts and you would have the money without expanding the debt
Pototan
(2,189 posts)they can't get every Repuke vote for $4T.
And the Dems won't give them that much, especially once the cuts are incorporated.
PortTack
(34,990 posts)RainCaster
(11,766 posts)How else will they pay for those tax breaks the rich need so desperately? Push that debt off to another generation of MAGA spawn who will have to pay for it.
yankee87
(2,433 posts)Go and rescind the tax cuts of the last ten tax cuts
slightlv
(4,645 posts)This fiscal responsibility! /snark
4 trillion dollars for 19th and 20th century theories on border security, and money for all the wars they're planning. Hope the magas are happy, because it will be at the expense of Ss and Medicare... which is not part of the debt... and spending on food vouchers for the least among us.
How so utterly Christian of them. They do so have the moral high ground, eh? /snark.
Nasruddin
(892 posts)Time for Republicans to learn about tit-for-tat prisoner's dilemma
Trueblue1968
(18,358 posts)erodriguez
(790 posts)Irish_Dem
(61,090 posts)Quanto Magnus
(1,053 posts)It's their guy...........
DallasNE
(7,620 posts)Setting a target amount without first putting together the proposed spending budget would be a mistake. I think the actual number based on a proposed budget would need to be largerperhaps $5.5T. It would take 60 votes in the Senate, but I think the better option would be to cancel the Wilson-era law that established the debt limit in the first place. That may force Congress to use the Committees to write the Appropriation measures to fund the government and how to pay for it.
Ray Bruns
(4,809 posts)Even stinky knows he cant cut enough out of the budget and keep his tax cuts without borrowing money to pay for it.
Grins
(7,976 posts)Because to Republicans - Tax cuts are "Magic Beans!"
Martin68
(24,822 posts)After all their BS about fiscal responsibility. Every time a Republican becomes president we go farther in debt.These people are traitorous criminals.