Supreme Court Rejects New Bid to Let President Fire Agency Heads
Source: Bloomberg
(Bloomberg) -- The US Supreme Court turned away a fresh bid to put independent federal agencies under direct presidential control, as the justices steered clear of a fight with implications for the Federal Trade Commission and Securities and Exchange Commission.
The high court, without comment, refused to hear an appeal from Leachco Inc., an Oklahoma-based company seeking to stop a complaint being pressed by the Consumer Product Safety Commission.
Leachco contended the case was fundamentally flawed because the CPSCs commissioners have job protections that insulate them from political accountability. The company argued in its appeal that the Constitution gives the president broad power to fire the heads of executive-branch agencies.
Leachco urged the Supreme Court to reconsider a 90-year-old ruling that paved the way for the independent agencies that now proliferate across the US government. The 1935 ruling, known as Humphreys Executor v. United States, upheld job protections enjoyed by FTC commissioners.
Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/supreme-court-rejects-new-bid-to-let-president-fire-agency-heads/ar-BB1rnjPA?ocid=msedgntp&pc=NMTS&cvid=a572114e12104c23bb605034b850f823&ei=102
Is this a pinpoint light at the end of the tunnel?
50 Shades Of Blue
(10,997 posts)William769
(56,270 posts)William769
(56,270 posts)As in who said what. Just curious.
is to let the lower court's ruling stand.
slightlv
(4,645 posts)we don't think well of them?
AllyCat
(17,337 posts)Bluethroughu
(6,194 posts)It's getting a little hot in the kitchen, so they may let things simmer before the grilling.