Durbin Seeks Justice Memos on Domestic Military Deployment

[BumRushDaShow]

Source: Bloomberg Law

Jan. 7, 2025, 5:55 PM EST


The Senate Judiciary Committee’s top Democrat is asking the Justice Department to rescind five opinions regarding presidential war powers issued by the Office of Legal Counsel and make public other documents regarding the president’s ability to deploy the military domestically.

“Unfortunately, a number of OLC opinions dating to prior presidential administrations which remain on the books contain conclusions that are inconsistent with Congress’s prerogatives with respect to war, Congress’s role in treaty-making, and/or the President’s duty under the Take Care Clause,” Richard Durbin (D-Ill.) wrote in a letter on Tuesday to Attorney General Merrick Garland that was obtained by Bloomberg Law.

The OLC opinions include ones regarding the FBI’s authority to apprehend suspects overseas, congressional authorization of military force, and whether the president is obligated to give Congress advance notice before withdrawing from a treaty.

Durbin said a 2020 OLC opinion concluding a statutory provision requiring such notice before a treaty withdrawal was unconstitutional is “inconsistent with a statute” requiring congressional action before the US withdraws from NATO. Durbin also requested that the Justice Department release 290 letters, opinions, and manuals pertaining to the domestic use of the US military.

Read more: https://news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/durbin-seeks-justice-memos-on-domestic-military-deployment

[bucolic_frolic]

1. Good. Let's get the legal landscape recognized and in play

How will Canada close it's borders? No wonder Trudeau wants out.

[Drum]

2. Bravo!

That’s heads-up politics there, Senator Durbin.

[NotHardly]

3. Got to get ahead of the 'shitification' that is coming.

[Baitball Blogger]

4. Do we have enough time?

[SeattleVet]

5. What good will it really do?

You know he'll ignore it, try to do whatever he wants, and then eventually run it through his rubber-stamp MAGA SCOTUS for final approval.

IOW, we're fucked!

[BumRushDaShow]

6. Well if anything is attempted that can be filed in the D.C. District court

and it eventually gets to the D.C. Appeals Court, "we" are majority there and it might at least introduce some delay with a favorable ruling before the SCOTUS reaches in to interfere (or maybe even surprises and bats away a 45 appeal).