US seeks new pedestrian safety rules aimed at increasingly massive SUVs and pickup trucks
Source: AP
Updated 3:44 PM EDT, September 9, 2024
DETROIT (AP) -- The U.S. government's road safety agency wants the auto industry to design new vehicles including increasingly large SUVs and pickup trucks so they reduce pedestrian deaths and injuries.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said Monday that for the first time it's proposing a new rule setting testing and performance requirements to minimize the risk of pedestrian head injuries.
The rule would cover all passenger vehicles weighing 10,000 pounds or less, but it's is aimed largely at big SUVs and pickups, which have grown in size and hood height over the years, causing blind spots for drivers.
NHTSA said pedestrian deaths increased 57% from 2013 to 2022, from 4,779 to 7,522. The agency says the rule would save 67 lives per year. Data show that nearly half of all pedestrian deaths when hit by the front of a vehicle are most common for SUVs and trucks.
Read more: https://apnews.com/article/us-pedestrian-safety-rule-suvs-pickup-trucks-8ab66c3416dcb91484ec502d6e114ad1
Link to NHTSA PRESS RELEASE - NHTSA Proposes New Vehicle Safety Standard to Better Protect Pedestrians
BWdem4life
(2,155 posts)And any new signal will have one.
sakabatou
(42,748 posts)and had crashes where and when the test dummies got hit, it made them slide under the truck. Remember, vehicles are supposed to pass when a dummy sides onto the hood, IIRC.
Jack from Charlotte
(2,370 posts)There's been a competition beween pick up truck makers, Ford, GM and Dodge.... I mean Ram. to see who can make the biggest, badest, toughest looking front end. Look at the tv pu truck ads the last 5-10 years. Look at the photo of the front of those pu's and SUVs. A child crossing the street in front of these vehicles cannot be seen. There's no reason the vehicles are so high in front other than "looks." DOT outlawed the hood ornament years ago because it was slicing people up who were hit by the front of vehicles.
progree
(11,449 posts)I didn't know that. Sheesh, I'm glad they did.
Lately (since June 2019) I've been in pedestrian and take-the-bus mode. 5 years already.
intheflow
(28,788 posts)Like me. Im sick of not being able to see around corners because these huge vehicles are parked on our tiny little northeast city streets.
MichMan
(12,604 posts)Just make them safer for pedestrians who are struck by them
IL Dem
(835 posts)bucolic_frolic
(45,813 posts)"Get the F*** out of the way!!"
He seemed nice.
Easterncedar
(2,960 posts)They whine about gas prices while driving a dick-wagging monster truck. No one should have the right to be so wasteful and polluting, including bitcoin miners and space tourists and mega yacht owners and on and on.
MichMan
(12,604 posts)As long as gas is affordable, people are going to continue to buy them. With gas prices going down, they will even look more appealing to buyers
Easterncedar
(2,960 posts)travelingthrulife
(285 posts)like 17% last year over the year before.
Why do we allow this foolishness when dealing with climate change?
EX500rider
(11,246 posts)Easterncedar
(2,960 posts)Ok. Exception for actual working vehicles.
GenThePerservering
(2,313 posts)are towing anything with them. Don't make excuses.
EX500rider
(11,246 posts)It's a free country want a big truck buy a big truck
AndyTiedye
(23,521 posts)There are uses for large trucks. There is no need for them to be constructed so that the driver cannot see pedestrians in front of the vehicle!
Particularly for the new electric trucks, why have a huge "engine" compartment WHEN THERE IS NO ENGINE IN THERE?
EX500rider
(11,246 posts)AndyTiedye
(23,521 posts)It is true that the Cybertruck at least doesn't have a 5-foot-high engine compartment at the front. They got one thing right.
ArkansasDemocrat1
(2,606 posts)Don't need some giant compensation device for my virility
Boomerproud
(8,256 posts)Yep. They're the ones who scream about high gas prices.
RubyRose
(205 posts)vehicle from killing a pedestrian if it collides with him or her.