Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump and Netanyahu Have Really Stepped in It Now (NYT)
And Trump has a seemingly endless supply.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/18/opinion/israel-america-iran-trump-vance.html?unlocked_article_code=1.rlA.hMdW.BpRPvAwCr0ud&smid=url-share
Unlocked.
By David French.
Very short excerpt:
The plain fact of the matter, however, is that if you cant dominate or destroy your opponent, you have to accommodate him, and that means compromise. When you choose to destroy your opponent, you will almost always have to deploy an immense amount of force and endure a considerable amount of loss.
Coercing Germany and Japan into unconditional surrender took millions of soldiers, untold devastation, and two nuclear strikes against Japan. Even the much simpler act of deposing Saddam Hussein and bringing Iraq under a modicum of control during the surge took hundreds of thousands of American and allied troops and years of constant combat.
The two presidents before Trump entered the White House in 2017 George W. Bush and Barack Obama took contrasting approaches. Bush chose to dominate through his invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. Obamas Iran deal was a compromise, an accommodation.
But the worst possible outcome is the Trump approach to try to dominate and fail. Because then youll be forced to compromise far more than youd like.
Coercing Germany and Japan into unconditional surrender took millions of soldiers, untold devastation, and two nuclear strikes against Japan. Even the much simpler act of deposing Saddam Hussein and bringing Iraq under a modicum of control during the surge took hundreds of thousands of American and allied troops and years of constant combat.
The two presidents before Trump entered the White House in 2017 George W. Bush and Barack Obama took contrasting approaches. Bush chose to dominate through his invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. Obamas Iran deal was a compromise, an accommodation.
But the worst possible outcome is the Trump approach to try to dominate and fail. Because then youll be forced to compromise far more than youd like.
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump and Netanyahu Have Really Stepped in It Now (NYT) (Original Post)
usonian
2 hrs ago
OP
Lovie777
(24,358 posts)1. We in the US is messed up................
erronis
(24,894 posts)2. Worst possible is the "Trump approach -- to try to dominate and fail". Over and over.
Thanks for this and the gift link. Looking forward to a Sunday read.
Bluetus
(3,256 posts)3. Netanyahu didn't expect to defeat Iran
For decades, Netanyahu has referred to these operations as "Mowing the grass", meaning that he plans for periodic atrocities / genocides as a routine thing. He never had any intention of sending an occupation force of Israelis, but he did try to get Trump to step into that one. Evidently there were enough people in the Pentagon to talk Trump out of that.
Renew Deal
(85,461 posts)4. That was well written
and accurate