Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(94,649 posts)
Fri May 15, 2026, 01:13 AM 21 hrs ago

Rep. Raskin: 'The Supreme Court has imposed an outrageous racial double standard.'

Acyn @Acyn 6h
Raskin: The Supreme Court has imposed an outrageous racial double standard. In the name of partisan gerrymandering, you can deliberately abolish every majority-African American district in the South. If you want to deliberately create majority-African American districts, it’s presumptively unconstitutional. So we have a racial double standard that’s being advanced by the MAGA Roberts Court.









Gavin Newsom @GavinNewsom
Stone cold racism on a scale I have NEVER seen in my lifetime is happening in real time.

Louisiana Governor Landry suspended a primary election — where tens of thousands of people had ALREADY VOTED — to redistrict and eliminate Black representation.

Our country is supposed to be about the expansion of liberty and freedom. We're seeing the exact opposite.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rep. Raskin: 'The Supreme Court has imposed an outrageous racial double standard.' (Original Post) bigtree 21 hrs ago OP
that's a long way to say THE SUPREME COURT IS RACIST Skittles 20 hrs ago #1
Just like the Federalist Society intended. rubbersole 18 hrs ago #2
he's actually highlighting the injust decision, itself bigtree 14 hrs ago #4
Raskin, run for president. Passages 14 hrs ago #3
Making EVERY district favor whites: fine. Making even ONE district favor blacks: unconstitutional. nt hvn_nbr_2 8 hrs ago #5
This is the discussion Johnny2X2X 8 hrs ago #6

rubbersole

(11,275 posts)
2. Just like the Federalist Society intended.
Fri May 15, 2026, 04:18 AM
18 hrs ago

The SC appears to be just getting started on legalizing their Christian Nationalist agenda. I know they're not going to allow a legal election to take away their power.

bigtree

(94,649 posts)
4. he's actually highlighting the injust decision, itself
Fri May 15, 2026, 08:30 AM
14 hrs ago

...which penalizes remedies related to black citizens, while allowing, directly enabling the very same thing for whites which they said was unlawful.

hvn_nbr_2

(6,813 posts)
5. Making EVERY district favor whites: fine. Making even ONE district favor blacks: unconstitutional. nt
Fri May 15, 2026, 02:19 PM
8 hrs ago

Johnny2X2X

(24,428 posts)
6. This is the discussion
Fri May 15, 2026, 02:22 PM
8 hrs ago

That's what they did, said it's OK to draw districts by race as long as it's only to ensure white candidates have majority white districts.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rep. Raskin: 'The Supreme...