Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

4bonhoffer

(224 posts)
Tue May 5, 2026, 08:54 AM Yesterday

Graham Platner-REMOVE THE CAP !

Good on him for pointing out that a simple fix for social security is to just remove the cap. There have been a lot of democratic representatives who have tried to get this message through, but it always seems to fall to the wayside.

It’s one of the most important and effective messages the Democratic Party has. Really powerful in its simplicity.
Hopefully , REMOVE THE CAP , will be a message that all democratic representatives will push. Push to the point that it becomes a national meme.

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Graham Platner-REMOVE THE CAP ! (Original Post) 4bonhoffer Yesterday OP
It is a critical message, good for him.. displacedvermoter Yesterday #1
I remember Al Franken hammering this point home ALBliberal Yesterday #2
Isn't the cap automatically raised every year? Renew Deal Yesterday #3
yes, it is. mopinko Yesterday #8
That's not the issue. It is about the rich paying their fair share. Bluetus Yesterday #9
No, that is *an* issue. We just have alot of issues is this backward country we live in Dave says 21 hrs ago #18
Commensurate or absolute? Torchlight Yesterday #11
Retitle your post to include the word Social Security. Please. LeftInTX Yesterday #4
Yeah, what's he hiding under that hat? druidity33 8 hrs ago #19
From what I've seen during his tv appearances BlueCaliDem 6 hrs ago #20
Removing the cap on SS would certainly help, but it's not a 'fix'. Captain Stern Yesterday #5
It would significantly improve the program's finances. Emile Yesterday #6
Yep - it should be the top line Cosmocat Yesterday #7
Will benefits be adjusted accordingly? MichMan Yesterday #10
This proposal is to help fund the system. Qutzupalotl Yesterday #14
Absolutely! Then the wealthiest MIGHT end up paying around a 17% tax on their obsene income. nt Exp Yesterday #12
Don't just remove the cap Miguelito Loveless Yesterday #13
I assume that means 401k withdrawals and proceeds from selling a primary residence as well. MichMan 23 hrs ago #15
OK, excluding retirement Miguelito Loveless 23 hrs ago #16
Apparently I misunderstood what "ALL" meant n/t MichMan 21 hrs ago #17

ALBliberal

(3,377 posts)
2. I remember Al Franken hammering this point home
Tue May 5, 2026, 10:25 AM
Yesterday

way back in the Air America days. Quick and easy fix.

mopinko

(73,849 posts)
8. yes, it is.
Tue May 5, 2026, 11:18 AM
Yesterday

and the billionaires arent going to pay more, cuz they dont get wages.
a better way to do it wd b to expand it to other forms of income, ie capital gains.

Bluetus

(3,031 posts)
9. That's not the issue. It is about the rich paying their fair share.
Tue May 5, 2026, 11:20 AM
Yesterday

The rich have dealt themselves every loophole in the book. When you look at ALL taxes, the morbidly rich pay a MUCH lower effective rate than working people.

There is no valid argument for capping their income for these programs. They have gotten rich off the backs of working people.

Dave says

(5,452 posts)
18. No, that is *an* issue. We just have alot of issues is this backward country we live in
Tue May 5, 2026, 05:49 PM
21 hrs ago

Great if you're rich. Not so great if you're not. Difficult and hard if you're poor.

LeftInTX

(34,783 posts)
4. Retitle your post to include the word Social Security. Please.
Tue May 5, 2026, 10:46 AM
Yesterday

I thought this was about a cap on his head!

druidity33

(6,928 posts)
19. Yeah, what's he hiding under that hat?
Wed May 6, 2026, 07:28 AM
8 hrs ago


I thought the same thing. I'm thinking who cares if he's balding? Then i'm thinking... he cant have another tattoo on his head can he?

Captain Stern

(2,254 posts)
5. Removing the cap on SS would certainly help, but it's not a 'fix'.
Tue May 5, 2026, 10:55 AM
Yesterday

Most estimates show the removing the cap on SS would extend the program's solvency by a few years.

But eventually, workers are going to have to start paying more in, or recipients are going to have to have their benefits reduced.

Cosmocat

(15,458 posts)
7. Yep - it should be the top line
Tue May 5, 2026, 11:03 AM
Yesterday

with a list of other sensible reforms.

The party should workshop it, find what makes the most sense and EVERY LAST D should sign off on and it, and make it one of the priorities they sell universally.

This is both the right thing and a serious problem that needs fixed AND something that be very popular.

MichMan

(17,327 posts)
10. Will benefits be adjusted accordingly?
Tue May 5, 2026, 11:25 AM
Yesterday

Ever since SS was created, the amount paid out monthly has been linked to how much people paid in. Is his plan to decouple that ?

Qutzupalotl

(15,849 posts)
14. This proposal is to help fund the system.
Tue May 5, 2026, 03:32 PM
Yesterday

The aim is to raise or eliminate the cap on earnings that are subject to SS tax, currently in the low six digits, and adjusted annually. So a billionaire and a mid-level manager currently pay in to the system at the same rate. By raising or eliminating the cap, we would subject more billionaire earnings to SS tax. Payouts would stay coupled to what you paid in.

Exp

(1,012 posts)
12. Absolutely! Then the wealthiest MIGHT end up paying around a 17% tax on their obsene income. nt
Tue May 5, 2026, 11:50 AM
Yesterday

MichMan

(17,327 posts)
15. I assume that means 401k withdrawals and proceeds from selling a primary residence as well.
Tue May 5, 2026, 03:57 PM
23 hrs ago

What about SS payments themselves?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Graham Platner-REMOVE THE...