General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCA-GOV: Swalwell campaign imploding after new sexual assault allegation
Multiple people have abruptly resigned from Rep. Eric Swalwells gubernatorial campaign, throwing the durability of his operation into question after the California Democrat repeatedly this week denied allegations of sexual misconduct.
Members of senior leadership have departed the campaign, including Courtni Pugh, a strategic adviser who served as Swalwells top liaison to organized labor groups.
Pugh confirmed her resignation, but declined to comment further. Two other people, who were granted anonymity to discuss internal campaign dynamics, confirmed there have been at least four departures.
The resignations came just before the San Francisco Chronicle published a report Friday afternoon reporting that a former staffer claims Swalwell had sexual encounters with her while working for him, and that he sexually assaulted her twice when she was too drunk to consent.
https://www.politico.com/news/2026/04/10/swalwell-campaign-imploding-amid-sexual-assault-allegation-00867619
Fiendish Thingy
(23,354 posts)Time for Katie Porter to step back into the spotlight and save California from having a republican governor shoved down its throat
walkingman
(10,927 posts)Phoenix61
(18,842 posts)Joinfortmill
(21,270 posts)Last edited Fri Apr 10, 2026, 06:44 PM - Edit history (2)
Swalwell doesn't seem the type to assault someone. I'm being cautious about that particular allegation. Don't forget, they tried this with Joe Biden, too. He went on Morning Joe and vigorously and successfully defended himself. Just saying, I'm being cautious.
EdmondDantes_
(1,852 posts)I don't think we can say who seems like the type.
Multiple different women have made claims. At that point, I can't think of any times it's been proven false.
Response to EdmondDantes_ (Reply #11)
PeaceWave This message was self-deleted by its author.
EdmondDantes_
(1,852 posts)This Democrat knows the difference between court of law and public opinion. But given the history and how hard it is for victims to come forward, I'm going to give victims the benefit of the doubt, especially when there's corroborating evidence.
Response to EdmondDantes_ (Reply #27)
PeaceWave This message was self-deleted by its author.
Torchlight
(6,886 posts)One carries legal weight, one doesn't.
Joinfortmill
(21,270 posts)WhiskeyGrinder
(26,993 posts)Joinfortmill
(21,270 posts)Tommy Carcetti
(44,517 posts)Obviously, these seem like serious charges and I'll consider them objectively as to whether or not they are believable.
To be honest, "Believe all women" is an overly broad statement as there are women who out there who are clearly politically motivated frauds (Tara Reade, Juanita Broaderick). But there are also women out there who have raised legitimate accusations and the fact that I once held the accused person in high esteem doesn't mean I can't re-evaluate. I mean, like many people I used to be a big fan of Bill Cosby.
So I don't subscribe to "Believe all women" as a hard and fast rule but I support "Listen to all women."
PatSeg
(53,219 posts)but not automatically believed. I've known some women who have said truly rotten things about men for some kind of gain or revenge. Though I am inclined to believe most accusations tend to be legitimate, I still need some evidence. Ruining a man's life and career over a political dirty trick is appalling....i.e. Al Franken.
Republicans have been trying to undermine the careers of Democratic politician with bogus sexual scandals for decades now. Of course, in the real world, the worst offenders tend to be republicans.
EdmondDantes_
(1,852 posts)Including at least one Democratic staffer? It's a lot harder to call things a dirty trick when it's a lot of women over multiple years and with confiding to others at the time of the event.
chowder66
(12,306 posts)chowder66
(12,306 posts)The timing is what was throwing me. It seems like there is a real problem with him.
It's the most brutal account that had me scratching my head. Some of it just doesn't make sense to me but I'm not the victim.
The other women seem consistent and there seems to be some real evidence there in the form of texts.
bluestarone
(22,254 posts)Is told!
RandySF
(84,785 posts)The unions are jumping ship as I type.
Response to RandySF (Original post)
PeaceWave This message was self-deleted by its author.
chowder66
(12,306 posts)It sure does smell fishy especially if Roger Stone is involved.
— Baghdad Bob (@yinzer77.bsky.social) 2026-04-10T21:14:49.555Z
Bettie
(19,755 posts)"he's being ratfucked" camp, but not 100% in either.
If he leaves the race, is this better for Democrats or the Republicans?
Response to Bettie (Reply #20)
PeaceWave This message was self-deleted by its author.
Bettie
(19,755 posts)running things.
We need people who understand what its like to have a budget, who get what it's like to live like an ordinary person.
But, I'm assuming Steyer is better than either of the Republicans.
chowder66
(12,306 posts)Joinfortmill
(21,270 posts)MichMan
(17,191 posts)Response to MichMan (Reply #16)
PeaceWave This message was self-deleted by its author.
a kennedy
(36,064 posts)Just gawd damn it. 🤬 🤬 🤬
RandySF
(84,785 posts)mr715
(3,629 posts)Jungle primary. We can lose this if the Dems don't start dropping out.
RandySF
(84,785 posts)Looks like a big one will be dropping out soon.
mr715
(3,629 posts)If this weren't going to drop, and instead be a slow burn, we'd lose this seat and control of the Senate.
For the good of the party, Swalwell must stand down.
msongs
(73,819 posts)Response to msongs (Reply #14)
PeaceWave This message was self-deleted by its author.
msongs
(73,819 posts)RussBLib
(10,657 posts)Warren Buffet? Except for that open marriage thing. But those are consenting adults.
uh, can't think of anyone else.
https://russblib.blogspot.com
Joinfortmill
(21,270 posts)lostincalifornia
(5,399 posts)Democrats in are stupid Jungle primaries where the top two candidates run in the general. This moves the odds up that in the general it will be a Democrat verses a republican, rather than a Democrat verses a Democrat in the general.
The primary field is too crowded. California could end up with two Republicans duking it out for the governorship.
The primary field is too crowded. California could end up with two Republicans duking it out for the governorship.
flvegan
(66,317 posts)cally
(21,870 posts)Looks like Katie Porter is the new front runner.
RussBLib
(10,657 posts)....when I was younger and stupider, I did a lot of sex and drugs, like many others. But at that time, there was a general understanding that this kind of behavior would eventually come back to haunt you if you went into public service. So I stayed out. I wonder when the rules changed? because you can get away with damn-near anything these days, except child molestation. But so far, a lot of people are escaping accountability even for that.
You have to have some cojones to still enter public life with skeletons galore in your closet. I guess it's all in how you handle the accusations and fallout.
https://russblib.blogspot.com
pfitz59
(12,758 posts)'Rat-fucking' is a real possibility.
mopinko
(73,761 posts)if hes a known heavy drinker, id lean toward it being true.
plus, if hes a known heavy drinker, he shouldnt b governor.
drink and drugs ought to b a deal breaker. esp in times like these.
Response to mopinko (Reply #42)
PeaceWave This message was self-deleted by its author.
WhiskeyGrinder
(26,993 posts)A spokesperson for Californians for a Fighter, an independent expenditure group supporting Swalwell, said in a statement: In light of the serious allegations, the IE is suspending campaign activity immediately.
Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said she had told Swalwell to end his bid. California Gov. Gavin Newsom did not immediately call on Swalwell to drop out but said in a statement: As we continue to learn more, these allegations from multiple sources are deeply troubling and must be taken seriously. Hakeem Jeffries, the House Democratic leader, said that these are very serious allegations that require a serious and thorough investigation.
Meanwhile, several of Swalwells rivals in the governors race called on him to drop out following reports by CNN and the San Francisco Chronicle in which women accused Swalwell of sexual misconduct.
duckworth969
(1,363 posts)MustLoveBeagles
(16,632 posts)At this point it doesn't matter if he's innocent or not. If you're a Democrat and there's the tiniest whif of scandal your colleagues won't support you and you're done. Another effective Dem bites the dust.
CousinIT
(12,570 posts)Some of them needed to drop out. I guess Swalwell will be hoisted out by his own petard. I also wonder which Republicans were behind this exposure, if not the manufacture of it. Who did they pay and how much to get them to talk? While I tend to believe the accusers, I also wonder what they were promised by Republicans to talk.
Shrek
(4,431 posts)Because of the primary rules, they benefit from having a large number of Democrats. If the vote is sufficiently split it's possible for two Republicans to emerge from the primary with the most votes.
As the field gets smaller, benefits increasingly accrue to the Democrats.
Orangenero
(3 posts)Swalwelk always seemed a little different, but I'm with him for now.
pinkstarburst
(2,031 posts)When you look at who benefits, it's the two republicans, obviously, and then also Steyer, and Katie Porter.
RandySF
(84,785 posts)it was known (or at least suspected) in Democratic circles.
Abolishinist
(2,967 posts)LeftInTX
(34,453 posts)It's a jungle primary, so everyone votes on the same ticket. You vote for several and the two highest are on the November ticket.
Swalwell dropping out doesn't help the GOP.
Abolishinist
(2,967 posts)It helps them nought. Hopefully Porter is next.