Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(79,327 posts)
Sun Jan 18, 2026, 11:10 AM 16 hrs ago

Trump's plot to tear the country in two

The president of the United States is at war with his own country
The Trump administration is engaged in a comprehensive war, and its enemy is half of America.

Jan. 18, 2026, 6:00 AM EST
By Paul Waldman


(MSNow) On Wednesday, President Trump shouted on Truth Social, “EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY FIRST, NO MORE PAYMENTS WILL BE MADE BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO STATES FOR THEIR CORRUPT CRIMINAL PROTECTION CENTERS KNOWN AS SANCTUARY CITIES.” What did he mean by “payments”? Highway funds, Medicare reimbursements to hospitals, education programs? No one seems to know, least of all Trump himself.

Trump can’t just shut off all federal funding to states he doesn’t like. But no one doubts he would if he could — or doubts he’s trying to. This is more than bloviation. Something important and dangerous is happening. The Trump administration is engaged in a comprehensive war, and its enemy is half of America. This war is being waged in rhetoric and regulation, budget cuts and violence. Its aim is to tear the country in two.

....(snip)....

Minneapolis is only one of the places Trump has sent National Guard troops and/or large numbers of ICE and Border Patrol agents. All of thoe places have been where most of the population votes for Democrats: Los Angeles, Washington, Memphis, New Orleans. And there will be more places.

Far less attention has been given to the administration’s efforts to create two separate systems of federal funding, one for red states and one for blue ones. Fortunately, at least for now, some of those efforts are being blocked by the courts. Last week, a federal judge ruled that the administration had acted illegally when it cancelled billions of dollars in environmental grants to 16 states led by Demcorats. “Defendants freely admit,” the judge noted, “that they made grant-termination decisions primarily — if not exclusively — based on whether the awardee resided in a state whose citizens voted for President Trump in 2024.” .................................(more)

https://www.ms.now/opinion/trump-ice-minnesota-renee-good-noem-civil-war




7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump's plot to tear the country in two (Original Post) marmar 16 hrs ago OP
It will have precisely the opposite effect Fiendish Thingy 16 hrs ago #1
He won't care - he is trying to 'positioning pieces' alittlelark 15 hrs ago #3
He cares desperately. Fiendish Thingy 15 hrs ago #5
Doing Putin's bidding. (NT) The Wizard 16 hrs ago #2
I don't think it's half... 2naSalit 15 hrs ago #4
In that case, secession! Wicked Blue 15 hrs ago #6
Every time they try this... appmanga 15 hrs ago #7

Fiendish Thingy

(22,213 posts)
1. It will have precisely the opposite effect
Sun Jan 18, 2026, 11:30 AM
16 hrs ago

The widespread universal suffering caused by Trump 2.0 will unify the vast majority of the people against this administration.

Fiendish Thingy

(22,213 posts)
5. He cares desperately.
Sun Jan 18, 2026, 11:50 AM
15 hrs ago

He knows his disapproval ratings = bloodbath in the midterms.

He is flailing impulsively and incompetently, while the people unify and organize against him.

appmanga

(1,394 posts)
7. Every time they try this...
Sun Jan 18, 2026, 12:21 PM
15 hrs ago

...the federal courts beat them back, so, at this point, it's become nothing more than performative. If the Supreme Court would have lived up to the moment, this regime would have been weakened faster, but they have their own agenda, which appear to be the opposite of what previous Courts have tried to do: make the law more clear with the result being less cases for them to decide. The Roberts Court wants to put their thumb into every pie, and create bad law while they do it. Fifty years from now, the decision that gave Trump expanded power will be seen in the same ill-repute (after being overturned) as Dred Scott, Plessy, and Korematsu.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump's plot to tear the ...