General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSenate Republicans propose deeper Medicaid cuts. Here's what that means.
Senate Republicans propose deeper Medicaid cuts. Here’s what that means.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/senate-republicans-propose-deeper-medicaid-021551180.html
Last month, House Republicans passed massive tax-and-spending legislation projected to result in 7.8 million fewer Medicaid enrollees. The Senate Finance Committee’s revisions to the bill released Monday could prompt even steeper coverage losses, sharply reining in a Medicaid financing maneuver that hospital groups say would slash payments to their facilities.
“The Senate just made a bad bill worse,” Chip Kahn, CEO of the Federation of American Hospitals, said in a statement. “Rural communities would take the hardest hit, with struggling hospitals compelled to face difficult decisions about what services to cut.”
Rural areas disproportionately rely on Medicaid, and their hospitals are often the first backstop for patients without health coverage. Hospital networks said they might reduce pediatric, maternity or behavioral health services; end telehealth programs; close rural facilities; or enact layoffs if the Medicaid cuts become law, in a recent member survey by the American Medical Group Association before the Senate bill was released.
These changes would partly be the result of caps on provider taxes, an unusual example of a tax many hospitals are happy to pay. States charge extra taxes to medical providers - mainly hospitals, nursing homes and facilities for people with intellectual disabilities - and in return give the providers higher Medicaid payments. That brings in more federal matching funds, which are pegged to state payments.

Joinfortmill
(18,528 posts)Miles Archer
(19,872 posts)I take a lot for granted. I post here, political posts are part of what I do on Facebook, as well as Bluesky. I'd say I'm "politically active." I know a lot of people who just turn their heads the other way and go about their business. Some of them are Fox addicts, and reject anything that doesn't come from them or Newsmax. Others are exhausted by Trump and just want to go to their happy place. I personally think we'd be having "NO KINGS" events 7 days a week if more people had been paying attention to this abomination of a bill on its various steps along the way.
And the irony is that most of the "objections" from Republicans have been based on the cuts to the social safety net. Veterans programs, and more have "not been severe enough."
joshdawg
(2,837 posts)Take everything from the poor and give it all to the rich since they deserve it more than anyone else.
thought crime
(488 posts)If the general public truly understood the scale of economic injustice in this country, Bernie Sanders would have been crowned King long ago.
oasis
(52,471 posts)
Marthe48
(21,214 posts)Why not lower the price of the services? People in the U.S. pay more for every single aspect of medical care than any other country. I just read that hospitals can charge $700 for a bag of saline solution, which costs them $2.
travelingthrulife
(2,862 posts)staff and room and board costs with those price increases. I don't know why they don't inform people of this in the bills they receive.
thought crime
(488 posts)NoMoreRepugs
(11,480 posts)valleyrogue
(2,208 posts)They are trying to claim that Medicaid recipients are nothing but a bunch of lazy baby mommas and male bums with a dozen kids in tow when in fact the lion's share of the benefits go to those in nursing homes.
These people are vicious and stupid.
Montauk6
(9,166 posts)Both sides, huh....
Malloy 3:16 ringing loud and clear!
sakabatou
(45,074 posts)groundloop
(13,112 posts)because Billionaires don't like paying their fair share of taxes.
DENVERPOPS
(12,987 posts)The Rich and shameless feel they shouldn't pay ANY taxes because THEY provide the jobs. And if it wasn't for them, there would be NO jobs.....
Wonder Why
(5,953 posts)avoid going on Medicare themselves.
--- For those that can't do without it.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(125,876 posts)AKA pissing down someone's backside and telling them it's raining.
Evolve Dammit
(20,997 posts)
cstanleytech
(27,758 posts)If we take the majority at State level government it gives us the ability to set state voting districts. Then maybe the districts will be set by population which means cities, where the majority of the people live would have a true fair say.
AllaN01Bear
(26,383 posts)when my late mom was alive and the rs would cut medicare, ss ssi, etc, she would say,, quit nickleing and diming it, just get rid of it and then see what happens .
louis-t
(24,408 posts)"IT'S JUST NOT CRUEL ENOUGH!!"