General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNeil deGrasse Tyson for president
We need someone with a high profile to announce a run for president in 2028. A scientist! A Ph.D. in astrophysics. Someone that will dog the shit out of Trump and Musk and keep pointing out their lies and bullshit. A damn-near atheist to boot that can quote Scripture. A writer of books, a TV personality. A smooth-talking self-deprecator that can win arguments in multiple fields.
Why the fuck not?
https://russblib.blogspot.com/?m=1
![](/du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
valleyrogue
(1,522 posts)with people who don't know shit about government.
RussBLib
(9,781 posts)Hell, Tuberville still probably doesn't know how many branches of govt there are.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(118,161 posts)I respect the guy but I don't think he'd want to be part of that mess.
RussBLib
(9,781 posts)Lol.
He could be convinced.
dalton99a
(85,957 posts)![](/emoticons/sarcasm.gif)
PoindexterOglethorpe
(27,073 posts)that Caroline Kennedy or Chelsea Clinton will run for office.
Has Neil deGrasse Tyson everl expressed interest in running for office? Does he have the skill set for the job?
And simply pointing out, true as it may be, that the current office holder is singularly unqualified, is hardly an endorsement for another completely unqualified candidate to run.
RussBLib
(9,781 posts)...but there is very, very, very little equivalency between Trump and Tyson.
Response to RussBLib (Original post)
PeaceWave This message was self-deleted by its author.
ZRB
(304 posts)I hate to see this BS spread here about a wonderful science educator. I seriously doubt he would want to lower himself to enter US politics.
Polybius
(19,024 posts)![](/emoticons/tsk.gif)
edhopper
(35,327 posts)On illegal planets.
Polybius
(19,024 posts)It was a bit harsh for that dreamer.
edhopper
(35,327 posts)It can stay on a Visa.
Polybius
(19,024 posts)Pluto identifies as a planet and wants to participate in planetarial activities.
LeftInTX
(32,048 posts)DavidDvorkin
(20,028 posts)writerJT
(199 posts)JI7
(91,255 posts)And anyone impressed by his resume would not have supported Trump.
IcyPeas
(23,100 posts)He didn't know the correct answer (grumpy philosophers was the category ) answer was Hobbes (Calvin and Hobbes) . I was very disappointed that he didn't get that right.
Abolishinist
(2,154 posts)will never vote for a "damn-near atheist".
Too bad, of course, but the total lack of logic/reason in favor of religion vs. science for most of our population would never allow such to happen.